[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200520110314.GI317569@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Wed, 20 May 2020 13:03:14 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@...il.com>,
Evgeniy Polyakov <zbr@...emap.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/8] connector/cn_proc: Protect send_msg() with a local
lock
On Tue, May 19, 2020 at 10:19:10PM +0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> @@ -40,10 +41,11 @@ static struct cb_id cn_proc_event_id = { CN_IDX_PROC, CN_VAL_PROC };
>
> /* proc_event_counts is used as the sequence number of the netlink message */
> static DEFINE_PER_CPU(__u32, proc_event_counts) = { 0 };
> +static DEFINE_LOCAL_LOCK(send_msg_lock);
Put it in a struct ?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists