linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 0/3] lib/vsprintf: Introduce %ptT for time64

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200520114333.GC520@jagdpanzerIV.localdomain>
Date:   Wed, 20 May 2020 20:43:33 +0900
From:   Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>
To:     Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>
Cc:     Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
        Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/3] lib/vsprintf: Introduce %ptT for time64_t

On (20/05/15 18:02), Petr Mladek wrote:
> On Wed 2020-04-15 20:00:43, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > It is a logical continuation of previously applied %ptR for struct rtc_time.
> > We have few users of time64_t that would like to print it.
> 
> It seems that everything was explained and the patches look good to
> me. If we allowed %ptR then it makes sense to allow %ptT as well.
> 
> For all three patches:
> 
> Rewieved-by: Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>

Acked-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>

	-ss