[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200520120450.GL317569@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Wed, 20 May 2020 14:04:50 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/8] locking: Introduce local_lock()
On Tue, May 19, 2020 at 10:19:05PM +0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> +/**
> + * DEFINE_LOCAL_LOCK - Define and initialize a per CPU local lock
> + * @lock: Name of the lock instance
> + */
> +#define DEFINE_LOCAL_LOCK(lvar) \
> + DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct local_lock, lvar) = { INIT_LOCAL_LOCK(lvar) }
> +
> +/**
> + * DECLARE_LOCAL_LOCK - Declare a defined per CPU local lock
> + * @lock: Name of the lock instance
> + */
> +#define DECLARE_LOCAL_LOCK(lvar) \
> + DECLARE_PER_CPU(struct local_lock, lvar)
So I think I'm going to argue having these is a mistake. The local_lock
should be put in a percpu structure along with the data it actually
protects.
> +#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC
> +# define LL_DEP_MAP_INIT(lockname) .dep_map = { .name = #lockname }
That wants to be:
.dep_map = {
.name = #lockname,
.wait_type_inner = LD_WAIT_SPIN,
}
> +#else
> +# define LL_DEP_MAP_INIT(lockname)
> +#endif
Powered by blists - more mailing lists