[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200520135509.GY374218@vkoul-mobl.Dlink>
Date: Wed, 20 May 2020 19:25:09 +0530
From: Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>
To: Bard Liao <yung-chuan.liao@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: alsa-devel@...a-project.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
tiwai@...e.de, broonie@...nel.org, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
jank@...ence.com, srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org,
rander.wang@...ux.intel.com, ranjani.sridharan@...ux.intel.com,
hui.wang@...onical.com, pierre-louis.bossart@...ux.intel.com,
sanyog.r.kale@...el.com, slawomir.blauciak@...el.com,
mengdong.lin@...el.com, bard.liao@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] soundwire: intel: use a single module
On 20-05-20, 03:19, Bard Liao wrote:
> From: Rander Wang <rander.wang@...el.com>
>
> It's not clear why we have two modules for the Intel controller/master
> support when there is a single Kconfig. This adds complexity for no
> good reason, the two parts need to work together anyways.
Applied, thanks
--
~Vinod
Powered by blists - more mailing lists