| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <lsq.1589984009.798531406@decadent.org.uk>
Date: Wed, 20 May 2020 15:14:54 +0100
From: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
CC: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, Denis Kirjanov <kda@...ux-powerpc.org>,
"David Sterba" <dsterba@...e.com>,
"Filipe Manana" <fdmanana@...e.com>,
"Nikolay Borisov" <nborisov@...e.com>,
"Josef Bacik" <josef@...icpanda.com>
Subject: [PATCH 3.16 86/99] Btrfs: fix race between adding and putting
tree mod seq elements and nodes
3.16.84-rc1 review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@...e.com>
commit 7227ff4de55d931bbdc156c8ef0ce4f100c78a5b upstream.
There is a race between adding and removing elements to the tree mod log
list and rbtree that can lead to use-after-free problems.
Consider the following example that explains how/why the problems happens:
1) Task A has mod log element with sequence number 200. It currently is
the only element in the mod log list;
2) Task A calls btrfs_put_tree_mod_seq() because it no longer needs to
access the tree mod log. When it enters the function, it initializes
'min_seq' to (u64)-1. Then it acquires the lock 'tree_mod_seq_lock'
before checking if there are other elements in the mod seq list.
Since the list it empty, 'min_seq' remains set to (u64)-1. Then it
unlocks the lock 'tree_mod_seq_lock';
3) Before task A acquires the lock 'tree_mod_log_lock', task B adds
itself to the mod seq list through btrfs_get_tree_mod_seq() and gets a
sequence number of 201;
4) Some other task, name it task C, modifies a btree and because there
elements in the mod seq list, it adds a tree mod elem to the tree
mod log rbtree. That node added to the mod log rbtree is assigned
a sequence number of 202;
5) Task B, which is doing fiemap and resolving indirect back references,
calls btrfs get_old_root(), with 'time_seq' == 201, which in turn
calls tree_mod_log_search() - the search returns the mod log node
from the rbtree with sequence number 202, created by task C;
6) Task A now acquires the lock 'tree_mod_log_lock', starts iterating
the mod log rbtree and finds the node with sequence number 202. Since
202 is less than the previously computed 'min_seq', (u64)-1, it
removes the node and frees it;
7) Task B still has a pointer to the node with sequence number 202, and
it dereferences the pointer itself and through the call to
__tree_mod_log_rewind(), resulting in a use-after-free problem.
This issue can be triggered sporadically with the test case generic/561
from fstests, and it happens more frequently with a higher number of
duperemove processes. When it happens to me, it either freezes the VM or
it produces a trace like the following before crashing:
[ 1245.321140] general protection fault: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP DEBUG_PAGEALLOC PTI
[ 1245.321200] CPU: 1 PID: 26997 Comm: pool Not tainted 5.5.0-rc6-btrfs-next-52 #1
[ 1245.321235] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.12.0-0-ga698c8995f-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014
[ 1245.321287] RIP: 0010:rb_next+0x16/0x50
[ 1245.321307] Code: ....
[ 1245.321372] RSP: 0018:ffffa151c4d039b0 EFLAGS: 00010202
[ 1245.321388] RAX: 6b6b6b6b6b6b6b6b RBX: ffff8ae221363c80 RCX: 6b6b6b6b6b6b6b6b
[ 1245.321409] RDX: 0000000000000001 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: ffff8ae221363c80
[ 1245.321439] RBP: ffff8ae20fcc4688 R08: 0000000000000002 R09: 0000000000000000
[ 1245.321475] R10: ffff8ae20b120910 R11: 00000000243f8bb1 R12: 0000000000000038
[ 1245.321506] R13: ffff8ae221363c80 R14: 000000000000075f R15: ffff8ae223f762b8
[ 1245.321539] FS: 00007fdee1ec7700(0000) GS:ffff8ae236c80000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
[ 1245.321591] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
[ 1245.321614] CR2: 00007fded4030c48 CR3: 000000021da16003 CR4: 00000000003606e0
[ 1245.321642] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
[ 1245.321668] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
[ 1245.321706] Call Trace:
[ 1245.321798] __tree_mod_log_rewind+0xbf/0x280 [btrfs]
[ 1245.321841] btrfs_search_old_slot+0x105/0xd00 [btrfs]
[ 1245.321877] resolve_indirect_refs+0x1eb/0xc60 [btrfs]
[ 1245.321912] find_parent_nodes+0x3dc/0x11b0 [btrfs]
[ 1245.321947] btrfs_check_shared+0x115/0x1c0 [btrfs]
[ 1245.321980] ? extent_fiemap+0x59d/0x6d0 [btrfs]
[ 1245.322029] extent_fiemap+0x59d/0x6d0 [btrfs]
[ 1245.322066] do_vfs_ioctl+0x45a/0x750
[ 1245.322081] ksys_ioctl+0x70/0x80
[ 1245.322092] ? trace_hardirqs_off_thunk+0x1a/0x1c
[ 1245.322113] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x16/0x20
[ 1245.322126] do_syscall_64+0x5c/0x280
[ 1245.322139] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe
[ 1245.322155] RIP: 0033:0x7fdee3942dd7
[ 1245.322177] Code: ....
[ 1245.322258] RSP: 002b:00007fdee1ec6c88 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000010
[ 1245.322294] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007fded40210d8 RCX: 00007fdee3942dd7
[ 1245.322314] RDX: 00007fded40210d8 RSI: 00000000c020660b RDI: 0000000000000004
[ 1245.322337] RBP: 0000562aa89e7510 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 00007fdee1ec6d44
[ 1245.322369] R10: 0000000000000073 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00007fdee1ec6d48
[ 1245.322390] R13: 00007fdee1ec6d40 R14: 00007fded40210d0 R15: 00007fdee1ec6d50
[ 1245.322423] Modules linked in: ....
[ 1245.323443] ---[ end trace 01de1e9ec5dff3cd ]---
Fix this by ensuring that btrfs_put_tree_mod_seq() computes the minimum
sequence number and iterates the rbtree while holding the lock
'tree_mod_log_lock' in write mode. Also get rid of the 'tree_mod_seq_lock'
lock, since it is now redundant.
Fixes: bd989ba359f2ac ("Btrfs: add tree modification log functions")
Fixes: 097b8a7c9e48e2 ("Btrfs: join tree mod log code with the code holding back delayed refs")
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@...icpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@...e.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@...e.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@...e.com>
[bwh: Backported to 3.16:
- Use tree_mod_log_write_{,un}lock() in ctree.c for consistency
- Adjust context]
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
---
fs/btrfs/ctree.c | 8 ++------
fs/btrfs/ctree.h | 6 ++----
fs/btrfs/delayed-ref.c | 8 ++++----
fs/btrfs/disk-io.c | 1 -
fs/btrfs/tests/btrfs-tests.c | 1 -
5 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
--- a/fs/btrfs/ctree.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/ctree.c
@@ -365,12 +365,10 @@ u64 btrfs_get_tree_mod_seq(struct btrfs_
struct seq_list *elem)
{
tree_mod_log_write_lock(fs_info);
- spin_lock(&fs_info->tree_mod_seq_lock);
if (!elem->seq) {
elem->seq = btrfs_inc_tree_mod_seq(fs_info);
list_add_tail(&elem->list, &fs_info->tree_mod_seq_list);
}
- spin_unlock(&fs_info->tree_mod_seq_lock);
tree_mod_log_write_unlock(fs_info);
return elem->seq;
@@ -390,7 +388,7 @@ void btrfs_put_tree_mod_seq(struct btrfs
if (!seq_putting)
return;
- spin_lock(&fs_info->tree_mod_seq_lock);
+ tree_mod_log_write_lock(fs_info);
list_del(&elem->list);
elem->seq = 0;
@@ -401,19 +399,17 @@ void btrfs_put_tree_mod_seq(struct btrfs
* blocker with lower sequence number exists, we
* cannot remove anything from the log
*/
- spin_unlock(&fs_info->tree_mod_seq_lock);
+ tree_mod_log_write_unlock(fs_info);
return;
}
min_seq = cur_elem->seq;
}
}
- spin_unlock(&fs_info->tree_mod_seq_lock);
/*
* anything that's lower than the lowest existing (read: blocked)
* sequence number can be removed from the tree.
*/
- tree_mod_log_write_lock(fs_info);
tm_root = &fs_info->tree_mod_log;
for (node = rb_first(tm_root); node; node = next) {
next = rb_next(node);
--- a/fs/btrfs/ctree.h
+++ b/fs/btrfs/ctree.h
@@ -1502,14 +1502,12 @@ struct btrfs_fs_info {
spinlock_t delayed_iput_lock;
struct list_head delayed_iputs;
- /* this protects tree_mod_seq_list */
- spinlock_t tree_mod_seq_lock;
atomic64_t tree_mod_seq;
- struct list_head tree_mod_seq_list;
- /* this protects tree_mod_log */
+ /* this protects tree_mod_log and tree_mod_seq_list */
rwlock_t tree_mod_log_lock;
struct rb_root tree_mod_log;
+ struct list_head tree_mod_seq_list;
atomic_t nr_async_submits;
atomic_t async_submit_draining;
--- a/fs/btrfs/delayed-ref.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/delayed-ref.c
@@ -344,7 +344,7 @@ void btrfs_merge_delayed_refs(struct btr
if (head->is_data)
return;
- spin_lock(&fs_info->tree_mod_seq_lock);
+ read_lock(&fs_info->tree_mod_log_lock);
if (!list_empty(&fs_info->tree_mod_seq_list)) {
struct seq_list *elem;
@@ -352,7 +352,7 @@ void btrfs_merge_delayed_refs(struct btr
struct seq_list, list);
seq = elem->seq;
}
- spin_unlock(&fs_info->tree_mod_seq_lock);
+ read_unlock(&fs_info->tree_mod_log_lock);
node = rb_first(&head->ref_root);
while (node) {
@@ -377,7 +377,7 @@ int btrfs_check_delayed_seq(struct btrfs
struct seq_list *elem;
int ret = 0;
- spin_lock(&fs_info->tree_mod_seq_lock);
+ read_lock(&fs_info->tree_mod_log_lock);
if (!list_empty(&fs_info->tree_mod_seq_list)) {
elem = list_first_entry(&fs_info->tree_mod_seq_list,
struct seq_list, list);
@@ -390,7 +390,7 @@ int btrfs_check_delayed_seq(struct btrfs
}
}
- spin_unlock(&fs_info->tree_mod_seq_lock);
+ read_unlock(&fs_info->tree_mod_log_lock);
return ret;
}
--- a/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c
@@ -2167,7 +2167,6 @@ int open_ctree(struct super_block *sb,
spin_lock_init(&fs_info->delayed_iput_lock);
spin_lock_init(&fs_info->defrag_inodes_lock);
spin_lock_init(&fs_info->free_chunk_lock);
- spin_lock_init(&fs_info->tree_mod_seq_lock);
spin_lock_init(&fs_info->super_lock);
spin_lock_init(&fs_info->qgroup_op_lock);
spin_lock_init(&fs_info->buffer_lock);
--- a/fs/btrfs/tests/btrfs-tests.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/tests/btrfs-tests.c
@@ -109,7 +109,6 @@ struct btrfs_fs_info *btrfs_alloc_dummy_
spin_lock_init(&fs_info->qgroup_op_lock);
spin_lock_init(&fs_info->super_lock);
spin_lock_init(&fs_info->fs_roots_radix_lock);
- spin_lock_init(&fs_info->tree_mod_seq_lock);
mutex_init(&fs_info->qgroup_ioctl_lock);
mutex_init(&fs_info->qgroup_rescan_lock);
rwlock_init(&fs_info->tree_mod_log_lock);
Powered by blists - more mailing lists