| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 21 May 2020 15:27:14 -0700
From: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
To: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@...el.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de>,
"James E.J. Bottomley" <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>,
Helge Deller <deller@....de>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
x86@...nel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Chris Zankel <chris@...kel.net>,
Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@...il.com>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
linux-snps-arc@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-csky@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mips@...r.kernel.org, linux-parisc@...r.kernel.org,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, sparclinux@...r.kernel.org,
linux-xtensa@...ux-xtensa.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
Christian Koenig <christian.koenig@....com>,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arch/{mips,sparc,microblaze,powerpc}: Don't enable
pagefault/preempt twice
On 5/21/20 10:42 AM, Ira Weiny wrote:
> On Thu, May 21, 2020 at 09:05:41AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
>> On 5/19/20 10:13 PM, Ira Weiny wrote:
>>> On Tue, May 19, 2020 at 12:42:15PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
>>>> On Tue, May 19, 2020 at 11:40:32AM -0700, Ira Weiny wrote:
>>>>> On Tue, May 19, 2020 at 09:54:22AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
>>>>>> On Mon, May 18, 2020 at 11:48:43AM -0700, ira.weiny@...el.com wrote:
>>>>>>> From: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@...el.com>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The kunmap_atomic clean up failed to remove one set of pagefault/preempt
>>>>>>> enables when vaddr is not in the fixmap.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Fixes: bee2128a09e6 ("arch/kunmap_atomic: consolidate duplicate code")
>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@...el.com>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> microblazeel works with this patch,
>>>>>
>>>>> Awesome... Andrew in my rush yesterday I should have put a reported by on the
>>>>> patch for Guenter as well.
>>>>>
>>>>> Sorry about that Guenter,
>>>>
>>>> No worries.
>>>>
>>>>> Ira
>>>>>
>>>>>> as do the nosmp sparc32 boot tests,
>>>>>> but sparc32 boot tests with SMP enabled still fail with lots of messages
>>>>>> such as:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> BUG: Bad page state in process swapper/0 pfn:006a1
>>>>>> page:f0933420 refcount:0 mapcount:1 mapping:(ptrval) index:0x1
>>>>>> flags: 0x0()
>>>>>> raw: 00000000 00000100 00000122 00000000 00000001 00000000 00000000 00000000
>>>>>> page dumped because: nonzero mapcount
>>>>>> Modules linked in:
>>>>>> CPU: 0 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Tainted: G B 5.7.0-rc6-next-20200518-00002-gb178d2d56f29 #1
>>>>>> [f00e7ab8 :
>>>>>> bad_page+0xa8/0x108 ]
>>>>>> [f00e8b54 :
>>>>>> free_pcppages_bulk+0x154/0x52c ]
>>>>>> [f00ea024 :
>>>>>> free_unref_page+0x54/0x6c ]
>>>>>> [f00ed864 :
>>>>>> free_reserved_area+0x58/0xec ]
>>>>>> [f0527104 :
>>>>>> kernel_init+0x14/0x110 ]
>>>>>> [f000b77c :
>>>>>> ret_from_kernel_thread+0xc/0x38 ]
>>>>>> [00000000 :
>>>>>> 0x0 ]
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Code path leading to that message is different but always the same
>>>>>> from free_unref_page().
>>>
>>> Actually it occurs to me that the patch consolidating kmap_prot is odd for
>>> sparc 32 bit...
>>>
>>> Its a long shot but could you try reverting this patch?
>>>
>>> 4ea7d2419e3f kmap: consolidate kmap_prot definitions
>>>
>>
>> That is not easy to revert, unfortunately, due to several follow-up patches.
>
> I have gotten your sparc tests to run and they all pass...
>
> 08:10:34 > ../linux-build-test/rootfs/sparc/run-qemu-sparc.sh
> Build reference: v5.7-rc4-17-g852b6f2edc0f
>
That doesn't look like it is linux-next, which I guess means that something
else in linux-next breaks it. What is your qemu version ?
Thanks,
Guenter
> Building sparc32:SPARCClassic:nosmp:scsi:hd ... running ......... passed
> Building sparc32:SPARCbook:nosmp:scsi:cd ... running ......... passed
> Building sparc32:LX:nosmp:noapc:scsi:hd ... running ......... passed
> Building sparc32:SS-4:nosmp:initrd ... running ......... passed
> Building sparc32:SS-5:nosmp:scsi:hd ... running ......... passed
> Building sparc32:SS-10:nosmp:scsi:cd ... running ......... passed
> Building sparc32:SS-20:nosmp:scsi:hd ... running ......... passed
> Building sparc32:SS-600MP:nosmp:scsi:hd ... running ......... passed
> Building sparc32:Voyager:nosmp:noapc:scsi:hd ... running ......... passed
> Building sparc32:SS-4:smp:scsi:hd ... running ......... passed
> Building sparc32:SS-5:smp:scsi:cd ... running ......... passed
> Building sparc32:SS-10:smp:scsi:hd ... running ......... passed
> Building sparc32:SS-20:smp:scsi:hd ... running ......... passed
> Building sparc32:SS-600MP:smp:scsi:hd ... running ......... passed
> Building sparc32:Voyager:smp:noapc:scsi:hd ... running ......... passed
>
> Is there another test I need to run?
>
> Ira
>
>
>>
>> Guenter
>>
>>> Alternately I will need to figure out how to run the sparc on qemu here...
>>>
>>> Thanks very much for all the testing though! :-D
>>>
>>> Ira
>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Still testing ppc images.
>>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ppc image tests are passing with this patch.
>>>>
>>>> Guenter
>>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists