linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 0/7] firmware: smccc: Add basic SMCCC v1.2 + ARCH_SOC

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAK8P3a1h1MR4Mq2sSV_FDUodrfaKRFtyOuOOGPWAbPYbzjc4YQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 21 May 2020 09:34:10 +0200
From:   Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To:     Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>
Cc:     Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
        Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>,
        Steven Price <steven.price@....com>, harb@...erecomputing.com,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/7] firmware: smccc: Add basic SMCCC v1.2 +
 ARCH_SOC_ID support

On Thu, May 21, 2020 at 9:07 AM Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 11:54:16PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 11:29 PM Will Deacon <will@...nel.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Mon, 18 May 2020 10:12:15 +0100, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> > > > This patch series adds support for SMCCCv1.2 ARCH_SOC_ID.
> > > > This doesn't add other changes added in SMCCC v1.2 yet. They will
> > > > follow these soon along with its first user SPCI/PSA-FF.
> > > >
> > > > This is tested using upstream TF-A + the patch[3] fixing the original
> > > > implementation there.
> > > >
> > > > [...]
> > >
> > > Applied to arm64 (for-next/smccc), thanks!
> > >
> > > [1/7] firmware: smccc: Add HAVE_ARM_SMCCC_DISCOVERY to identify SMCCC v1.1 and above
> > >       https://git.kernel.org/arm64/c/e5bfb21d98b6
> > > [2/7] firmware: smccc: Update link to latest SMCCC specification
> > >       https://git.kernel.org/arm64/c/15c704ab6244
> > > [3/7] firmware: smccc: Add the definition for SMCCCv1.2 version/error codes
> > >       https://git.kernel.org/arm64/c/0441bfe7f00a
> > > [4/7] firmware: smccc: Drop smccc_version enum and use ARM_SMCCC_VERSION_1_x instead
> > >       https://git.kernel.org/arm64/c/ad5a57dfe434
> > > [5/7] firmware: smccc: Refactor SMCCC specific bits into separate file
> > >       https://git.kernel.org/arm64/c/f2ae97062a48
> > > [6/7] firmware: smccc: Add function to fetch SMCCC version
> > >       https://git.kernel.org/arm64/c/a4fb17465182
> > > [7/7] firmware: smccc: Add ARCH_SOC_ID support
> > >       https://git.kernel.org/arm64/c/ce6488f0ce09
> > >
> > > Arnd -- Sudeep's reply to you about the sysfs groups seemed reasonable to me,
> > > but please shout if you'd rather I dropped this in order to pursue an
> > > alternative approach.
> >
> > I missed the reply earlier, thanks for pointing me to it again.
> >
> > I'm not entirely convinced, but don't revert it for now because of that,
> > I assume we can find a solution.
> >
>
> I liked your idea of making this generic and hardcode values if required
> for other drivers. I will take a look at that/
>
> > However, please have a look at the build failure report for patch 5
> > and fix it if you can see what went wrong.
> >
>
> Any pointers for that failure ? I seem to have missed them. I pushed
> branch couple of times to my tree but got build success both times.
> Any specific config or compilers ?

See below for the reply from the 0day build bot to your email. It seems it
was not sent to the mailing list, but you were on Cc. Looking at it now,
the fix should be trivial.

    Arnd

8<---
I love your patch! Perhaps something to improve:

[auto build test WARNING on soc/for-next]
[also build test WARNING on arm64/for-next/core linus/master v5.7-rc6
next-20200519]
[if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help
improve the system. BTW, we also suggest to use '--base' option to specify the
base tree in git format-patch, please see https://stackoverflow.com/a/37406982]

url:    https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Sudeep-Holla/firmware-smccc-Add-basic-SMCCC-v1-2-ARCH_SOC_ID-support/20200518-171401
base:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/soc/soc.git for-next
config: arm64-randconfig-r026-20200519 (attached as .config)
compiler: clang version 11.0.0 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project
135b877874fae96b4372c8a3fbfaa8ff44ff86e3)
reproduce:
        wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross
-O ~/bin/make.cross
        chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
        # install arm64 cross compiling tool for clang build
        # apt-get install binutils-aarch64-linux-gnu
        # save the attached .config to linux build tree
        COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=clang make.cross ARCH=arm64

If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate
Reported-by: kbuild test robot <lkp@...el.com>

All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>, old ones prefixed by <<):

>> drivers/firmware/smccc/smccc.c:14:13: warning: no previous prototype for function 'arm_smccc_version_init' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
void __init arm_smccc_version_init(u32 version, enum arm_smccc_conduit conduit)
^
drivers/firmware/smccc/smccc.c:14:1: note: declare 'static' if the
function is not intended to be used outside of this translation unit
void __init arm_smccc_version_init(u32 version, enum arm_smccc_conduit conduit)
^
static
1 warning generated.

vim +/arm_smccc_version_init +14 drivers/firmware/smccc/smccc.c

    13
  > 14 void __init arm_smccc_version_init(u32 version, enum
arm_smccc_conduit conduit)
    15 {
    16 smccc_version = version;
    17 smccc_conduit = conduit;
    18 }
    19