linux-kernel - [PATCH 0/9] DT: Improve validation for Marvell SoCs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20200521091356.2211020-1-lkundrak@v3.sk>
Date:   Thu, 21 May 2020 11:13:47 +0200
From:   Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak@...sk>
To:     Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>
Cc:     Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@...ertech.it>,
        Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>,
        Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>,
        Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
        Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 0/9] DT: Improve validation for Marvell SoCs

Hi,

chained to this message is a second version of remaining patches from the
first spin of the "DT: Improve validation for Marvell SoCs" [1] patch set.

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200317093922.20785-1-lkundrak@v3.sk/

I've attempted to address the review of the v1, each patch includes a
detailed change log.

Compared to v1, wherever the license or maintainer information was
missing, I've filled in GPL-2.0-only and people listed in MAINTAINERS
file. As I've indicated in v1 cover letter, am not sure whether this is
the optimal course of action. However I've included the relevant people
in v1 Cc list and asked for clarifications, but didn't really get any
feedback to that.

Cheers
Lubo