[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200521003716.GA317575@carbon.dhcp.thefacebook.com>
Date: Wed, 20 May 2020 17:37:16 -0700
From: Roman Gushchin <guro@...com>
To: <js1304@...il.com>
CC: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <kernel-team@....com>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@...cle.com>,
Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@...jp.nec.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>,
Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/11] mm/page_isolation: prefer the node of the source
page
On Mon, May 18, 2020 at 10:20:47AM +0900, js1304@...il.com wrote:
> From: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>
>
> For locality, it's better to migrate the page to the same node
> rather than the node of the current caller's cpu.
>
> Signed-off-by: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>
Acked-by: Roman Gushchin <guro@...com>
> ---
> mm/page_isolation.c | 4 +++-
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/page_isolation.c b/mm/page_isolation.c
> index 2c11a38..7df89bd 100644
> --- a/mm/page_isolation.c
> +++ b/mm/page_isolation.c
> @@ -300,5 +300,7 @@ int test_pages_isolated(unsigned long start_pfn, unsigned long end_pfn,
>
> struct page *alloc_migrate_target(struct page *page, unsigned long private)
> {
> - return new_page_nodemask(page, numa_node_id(), &node_states[N_MEMORY]);
> + int nid = page_to_nid(page);
> +
> + return new_page_nodemask(page, nid, &node_states[N_MEMORY]);
Why not new_page_nodemask(page, page_to_nid(page), &node_states[N_MEMORY]) ?
Still fits into 80 characters.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists