linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 0/8] exec: Control flow simplifications

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 21 May 2020 06:53:36 -0500
From:   ebiederm@...ssion.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To:     Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>, Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>,
        Greg Ungerer <gerg@...ux-m68k.org>,
        Rob Landley <rob@...dley.net>,
        Bernd Edlinger <bernd.edlinger@...mail.de>,
        linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>,
        Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Casey Schaufler <casey@...aufler-ca.com>,
        linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
        James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>,
        "Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@...lyn.com>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/8] exec: Control flow simplifications

Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org> writes:

> On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 05:12:10PM -0500, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>> 
>> I have pushed this out to:
>> 
>> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/ebiederm/user-namespace.git exec-next
>> 
>> I have collected up the acks and reviewed-by's, and fixed a couple of
>> typos but that is it.
>
> Awesome!
>
>> If we need comment fixes or additional cleanups we can apply that on top
>> of this series.   This way the code can sit in linux-next until the
>> merge window opens.
>> 
>> Before I pushed this out I also tested this with Kees new test of
>> binfmt_misc and did not find any problems.
>
> Did this mean to say binfmt_script? It'd be nice to get a binfmt_misc
> test too, though.

Yes.  Sorry.  I meant your binfmt_script test.

Eric