[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200521152117.GC28818@bombadil.infradead.org>
Date: Thu, 21 May 2020 08:21:17 -0700
From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
To: Muchun Song <songmuchun@...edance.com>
Cc: adobriyan@...il.com, ast@...nel.org, daniel@...earbox.net,
kafai@...com, songliubraving@...com, yhs@...com, andriin@...com,
john.fastabend@...il.com, kpsingh@...omium.org,
ebiederm@...ssion.com, bernd.edlinger@...mail.de,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] files: Use rcu lock to get the file structures for
better performance
On Thu, May 21, 2020 at 08:38:35PM +0800, Muchun Song wrote:
> There is another safe way to get the file structure without
> holding the files->file_lock. That is rcu lock, and this way
> has better performance. So use the rcu lock instead of the
> files->file_lock.
What makes you think this is safe? Are you actually seeing contention
on this spinlock?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists