| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <20200521152301.2587579-14-hch@lst.de>
Date: Thu, 21 May 2020 17:22:51 +0200
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To: x86@...nel.org, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-parisc@...r.kernel.org, linux-um@...ts.infradead.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 13/23] bpf: rework the compat kernel probe handling
Instead of using the dangerous probe_kernel_read and strncpy_from_unsafe
helpers, rework the compat probes to check if an address is a kernel or
userspace one, and then use the low-level kernel or user probe helper
shared by the proper kernel and user probe helpers. This slightly
changes behavior as the compat probe on a user address doesn't check
the lockdown flags, just as the pure user probes do.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
---
kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c | 109 ++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
1 file changed, 67 insertions(+), 42 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c b/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c
index 737d739230a6b..43566cd2a8180 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c
@@ -136,17 +136,23 @@ static const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_override_return_proto = {
};
#endif
-BPF_CALL_3(bpf_probe_read_user, void *, dst, u32, size,
- const void __user *, unsafe_ptr)
+static __always_inline int
+bpf_probe_read_user_common(void *dst, u32 size, const void __user *unsafe_ptr)
{
- int ret = probe_user_read(dst, unsafe_ptr, size);
+ int ret;
+ ret = probe_user_read(dst, unsafe_ptr, size);
if (unlikely(ret < 0))
memset(dst, 0, size);
-
return ret;
}
+BPF_CALL_3(bpf_probe_read_user, void *, dst, u32, size,
+ const void __user *, unsafe_ptr)
+{
+ return bpf_probe_read_user_common(dst, size, unsafe_ptr);
+}
+
static const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_probe_read_user_proto = {
.func = bpf_probe_read_user,
.gpl_only = true,
@@ -156,17 +162,24 @@ static const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_probe_read_user_proto = {
.arg3_type = ARG_ANYTHING,
};
-BPF_CALL_3(bpf_probe_read_user_str, void *, dst, u32, size,
- const void __user *, unsafe_ptr)
+static __always_inline int
+bpf_probe_read_user_str_common(void *dst, u32 size,
+ const void __user *unsafe_ptr)
{
- int ret = strncpy_from_user_nofault(dst, unsafe_ptr, size);
+ int ret;
+ ret = strncpy_from_user_nofault(dst, unsafe_ptr, size);
if (unlikely(ret < 0))
memset(dst, 0, size);
-
return ret;
}
+BPF_CALL_3(bpf_probe_read_user_str, void *, dst, u32, size,
+ const void __user *, unsafe_ptr)
+{
+ return bpf_probe_read_user_str_common(dst, size, unsafe_ptr);
+}
+
static const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_probe_read_user_str_proto = {
.func = bpf_probe_read_user_str,
.gpl_only = true,
@@ -177,25 +190,25 @@ static const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_probe_read_user_str_proto = {
};
static __always_inline int
-bpf_probe_read_kernel_common(void *dst, u32 size, const void *unsafe_ptr,
- const bool compat)
+bpf_probe_read_kernel_common(void *dst, u32 size, const void *unsafe_ptr)
{
int ret = security_locked_down(LOCKDOWN_BPF_READ);
if (unlikely(ret < 0))
- goto out;
- ret = compat ? probe_kernel_read(dst, unsafe_ptr, size) :
- probe_kernel_read_strict(dst, unsafe_ptr, size);
+ goto fail;
+ ret = probe_kernel_read_strict(dst, unsafe_ptr, size);
if (unlikely(ret < 0))
-out:
- memset(dst, 0, size);
+ goto fail;
+ return ret;
+fail:
+ memset(dst, 0, size);
return ret;
}
BPF_CALL_3(bpf_probe_read_kernel, void *, dst, u32, size,
const void *, unsafe_ptr)
{
- return bpf_probe_read_kernel_common(dst, size, unsafe_ptr, false);
+ return bpf_probe_read_kernel_common(dst, size, unsafe_ptr);
}
static const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_probe_read_kernel_proto = {
@@ -207,50 +220,37 @@ static const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_probe_read_kernel_proto = {
.arg3_type = ARG_ANYTHING,
};
-BPF_CALL_3(bpf_probe_read_compat, void *, dst, u32, size,
- const void *, unsafe_ptr)
-{
- return bpf_probe_read_kernel_common(dst, size, unsafe_ptr, true);
-}
-
-static const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_probe_read_compat_proto = {
- .func = bpf_probe_read_compat,
- .gpl_only = true,
- .ret_type = RET_INTEGER,
- .arg1_type = ARG_PTR_TO_UNINIT_MEM,
- .arg2_type = ARG_CONST_SIZE_OR_ZERO,
- .arg3_type = ARG_ANYTHING,
-};
-
static __always_inline int
-bpf_probe_read_kernel_str_common(void *dst, u32 size, const void *unsafe_ptr,
- const bool compat)
+bpf_probe_read_kernel_str_common(void *dst, u32 size, const void *unsafe_ptr)
{
int ret = security_locked_down(LOCKDOWN_BPF_READ);
if (unlikely(ret < 0))
- goto out;
+ goto fail;
+
/*
- * The strncpy_from_unsafe_*() call will likely not fill the entire
- * buffer, but that's okay in this circumstance as we're probing
+ * The strncpy_from_kernel_nofault() call will likely not fill the
+ * entire buffer, but that's okay in this circumstance as we're probing
* arbitrary memory anyway similar to bpf_probe_read_*() and might
* as well probe the stack. Thus, memory is explicitly cleared
* only in error case, so that improper users ignoring return
* code altogether don't copy garbage; otherwise length of string
* is returned that can be used for bpf_perf_event_output() et al.
*/
- ret = compat ? strncpy_from_unsafe(dst, unsafe_ptr, size) :
- strncpy_from_kernel_nofault(dst, unsafe_ptr, size);
+ ret = strncpy_from_kernel_nofault(dst, unsafe_ptr, size);
if (unlikely(ret < 0))
-out:
- memset(dst, 0, size);
+ goto fail;
+
+ return 0;
+fail:
+ memset(dst, 0, size);
return ret;
}
BPF_CALL_3(bpf_probe_read_kernel_str, void *, dst, u32, size,
const void *, unsafe_ptr)
{
- return bpf_probe_read_kernel_str_common(dst, size, unsafe_ptr, false);
+ return bpf_probe_read_kernel_str_common(dst, size, unsafe_ptr);
}
static const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_probe_read_kernel_str_proto = {
@@ -262,10 +262,34 @@ static const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_probe_read_kernel_str_proto = {
.arg3_type = ARG_ANYTHING,
};
+#ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_NON_OVERLAPPING_ADDRESS_SPACE
+BPF_CALL_3(bpf_probe_read_compat, void *, dst, u32, size,
+ const void *, unsafe_ptr)
+{
+ if ((unsigned long)unsafe_ptr < TASK_SIZE) {
+ return bpf_probe_read_user_common(dst, size,
+ (__force void __user *)unsafe_ptr);
+ }
+ return bpf_probe_read_kernel_common(dst, size, unsafe_ptr);
+}
+
+static const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_probe_read_compat_proto = {
+ .func = bpf_probe_read_compat,
+ .gpl_only = true,
+ .ret_type = RET_INTEGER,
+ .arg1_type = ARG_PTR_TO_UNINIT_MEM,
+ .arg2_type = ARG_CONST_SIZE_OR_ZERO,
+ .arg3_type = ARG_ANYTHING,
+};
+
BPF_CALL_3(bpf_probe_read_compat_str, void *, dst, u32, size,
const void *, unsafe_ptr)
{
- return bpf_probe_read_kernel_str_common(dst, size, unsafe_ptr, true);
+ if ((unsigned long)unsafe_ptr < TASK_SIZE) {
+ return bpf_probe_read_user_str_common(dst, size,
+ (__force void __user *)unsafe_ptr);
+ }
+ return bpf_probe_read_kernel_str_common(dst, size, unsafe_ptr);
}
static const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_probe_read_compat_str_proto = {
@@ -276,6 +300,7 @@ static const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_probe_read_compat_str_proto = {
.arg2_type = ARG_CONST_SIZE_OR_ZERO,
.arg3_type = ARG_ANYTHING,
};
+#endif /* CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_NON_OVERLAPPING_ADDRESS_SPACE */
BPF_CALL_3(bpf_probe_write_user, void __user *, unsafe_ptr, const void *, src,
u32, size)
--
2.26.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists