linux-kernel - Re: [PATCHv2 3/4] coresight: replicator: Reset replicator if context is lost

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <e91e046fdbac129ef27ac0e665589a7f@codeaurora.org>
Date:   Thu, 21 May 2020 22:33:13 +0530
From:   Sai Prakash Ranjan <saiprakash.ranjan@...eaurora.org>
To:     Mike Leach <mike.leach@...aro.org>
Cc:     Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>,
        Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>,
        Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
        Coresight ML <coresight@...ts.linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 3/4] coresight: replicator: Reset replicator if context
 is lost

Hi Mike,

On 2020-05-21 21:38, Mike Leach wrote:
> Hi Sai,
> 
> On Tue, 19 May 2020 at 14:36, Sai Prakash Ranjan
> <saiprakash.ranjan@...eaurora.org> wrote:
>> 
>> On some QCOM SoCs, replicators in Always-On domain loses its
>> context as soon as the clock is disabled. Currently as a part
>> of pm_runtime workqueue, clock is disabled after the replicator
>> is initialized by amba_pm_runtime_suspend assuming that context
>> is not lost which is not true for replicators with such
>> limitations. So add a new property "qcom,replicator-loses-context"
>> to identify such replicators and reset them.
>> 
>> Suggested-by: Mike Leach <mike.leach@...aro.org>
>> Signed-off-by: Sai Prakash Ranjan <saiprakash.ranjan@...eaurora.org>
>> ---
>> 
>> Added Mike's suggested by for parts other than the DT property.
>> Perhaps I should add Co-developed-by Mike since the full skeletal
>> was given by Mike. I can add that if required on the next version.
>> 

[...]

> 
> Suggested-by is just fine - I didn't actually try out my suggested
> code after all!
> 
> Reviewed-by Mike Leach <mike.leach@...aro.org>

Sure, thanks for the review.

Thanks,
Sai

-- 
QUALCOMM INDIA, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a 
member
of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation