[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAADnVQL_j3vGMTiQTfKWOZKhhuZxAQBQpU6W-BBeO+biTXrzSQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 20 May 2020 18:35:44 -0700
From: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>
To: Casey Schaufler <casey@...aufler-ca.com>
Cc: KP Singh <kpsingh@...omium.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>,
LSM List <linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>,
Anders Roxell <anders.roxell@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf] security: Fix hook iteration for secid_to_secctx
On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 8:15 AM Casey Schaufler <casey@...aufler-ca.com> wrote:
>
>
> On 5/20/2020 5:56 AM, KP Singh wrote:
> > From: KP Singh <kpsingh@...gle.com>
> >
> > secid_to_secctx is not stackable, and since the BPF LSM registers this
> > hook by default, the call_int_hook logic is not suitable which
> > "bails-on-fail" and casues issues when other LSMs register this hook and
> > eventually breaks Audit.
> >
> > In order to fix this, directly iterate over the security hooks instead
> > of using call_int_hook as suggested in:
> >
> > https: //lore.kernel.org/bpf/9d0eb6c6-803a-ff3a-5603-9ad6d9edfc00@...aufler-ca.com/#t
> >
> > Fixes: 98e828a0650f ("security: Refactor declaration of LSM hooks")
> > Fixes: 625236ba3832 ("security: Fix the default value of secid_to_secctx hook"
> > Reported-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>
> > Signed-off-by: KP Singh <kpsingh@...gle.com>
>
> This looks fine.
Tested. audit works now.
I fixed missing ')' in the commit log
and applied to bpf tree.
It will be on the way to Linus tree soon.
Thanks!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists