| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 22 May 2020 12:46:36 -0500
From: Babu Moger <babu.moger@....com>
To: James Morse <james.morse@....com>,
"x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>,
Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@...el.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
H Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v3 08/10] x86/resctrl: Merge AMD/Intel parse_bw() calls
> -----Original Message-----
> From: James Morse <james.morse@....com>
> Sent: Monday, May 18, 2020 8:19 AM
> To: x86@...nel.org; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
> Cc: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>; Reinette Chatre
> <reinette.chatre@...el.com>; Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>; Ingo
> Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>; Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>; H Peter Anvin
> <hpa@...or.com>; Moger, Babu <Babu.Moger@....com>; James Morse
> <james.morse@....com>
> Subject: [PATCH v3 08/10] x86/resctrl: Merge AMD/Intel parse_bw() calls
>
> Now that we've explained arch_needs_linear to resctrl, the parse_bw()
> calls are almost the same between AMD and Intel.
>
> The difference is '!is_mba_sc()', which is not checked on AMD. This
> will always be true on AMD CPUs as mba_sc cannot be enabled as
> is_mba_linear() is false.
>
> Removing this duplication means user-space visible behaviour and
> error messages are not validated or generated in different places.
>
> CC: Babu Moger <Babu.Moger@....com>
> Signed-off-by: James Morse <james.morse@....com>
> Reviewed-by: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@...el.com>
Reviewed-by : Babu Moger <babu.moger@....com>
> ---
> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/core.c | 3 +-
> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/ctrlmondata.c | 57 +----------------------
> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/internal.h | 6 +--
> 3 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 61 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/core.c
> b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/core.c
> index c6b73b0ee070..223e5b90bcfd 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/core.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/core.c
> @@ -168,6 +168,7 @@ struct rdt_resource rdt_resources_all[] = {
> .name = "MB",
> .domains = domain_init(RDT_RESOURCE_MBA),
> .cache_level = 3,
> + .parse_ctrlval = parse_bw,
> .format_str = "%d=%*u",
> .fflags = RFTYPE_RES_MB,
> },
> @@ -926,7 +927,6 @@ static __init void rdt_init_res_defs_intel(void)
> else if (r->rid == RDT_RESOURCE_MBA) {
> r->msr_base = MSR_IA32_MBA_THRTL_BASE;
> r->msr_update = mba_wrmsr_intel;
> - r->parse_ctrlval = parse_bw_intel;
> }
> }
> }
> @@ -946,7 +946,6 @@ static __init void rdt_init_res_defs_amd(void)
> else if (r->rid == RDT_RESOURCE_MBA) {
> r->msr_base = MSR_IA32_MBA_BW_BASE;
> r->msr_update = mba_wrmsr_amd;
> - r->parse_ctrlval = parse_bw_amd;
> }
> }
> }
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/ctrlmondata.c
> b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/ctrlmondata.c
> index e3bcd77add2b..b0e24cb6f85c 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/ctrlmondata.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/ctrlmondata.c
> @@ -21,59 +21,6 @@
> #include <linux/slab.h>
> #include "internal.h"
>
> -/*
> - * Check whether MBA bandwidth percentage value is correct. The value is
> - * checked against the minimum and maximum bandwidth values specified by
> - * the hardware. The allocated bandwidth percentage is rounded to the next
> - * control step available on the hardware.
> - */
> -static bool bw_validate_amd(char *buf, unsigned long *data,
> - struct rdt_resource *r)
> -{
> - unsigned long bw;
> - int ret;
> -
> - /* temporary: always false on AMD */
> - if (!r->membw.delay_linear && r->membw.arch_needs_linear) {
> - rdt_last_cmd_puts("No support for non-linear MB domains\n");
> - return false;
> - }
> -
> - ret = kstrtoul(buf, 10, &bw);
> - if (ret) {
> - rdt_last_cmd_printf("Non-decimal digit in MB value %s\n", buf);
> - return false;
> - }
> -
> - if (bw < r->membw.min_bw || bw > r->default_ctrl) {
> - rdt_last_cmd_printf("MB value %ld out of range [%d,%d]\n",
> bw,
> - r->membw.min_bw, r->default_ctrl);
> - return false;
> - }
> -
> - *data = roundup(bw, (unsigned long)r->membw.bw_gran);
> - return true;
> -}
> -
> -int parse_bw_amd(struct rdt_parse_data *data, struct rdt_resource *r,
> - struct rdt_domain *d)
> -{
> - unsigned long bw_val;
> -
> - if (d->have_new_ctrl) {
> - rdt_last_cmd_printf("Duplicate domain %d\n", d->id);
> - return -EINVAL;
> - }
> -
> - if (!bw_validate_amd(data->buf, &bw_val, r))
> - return -EINVAL;
> -
> - d->new_ctrl = bw_val;
> - d->have_new_ctrl = true;
> -
> - return 0;
> -}
> -
> /*
> * Check whether MBA bandwidth percentage value is correct. The value is
> * checked against the minimum and max bandwidth values specified by the
> @@ -110,8 +57,8 @@ static bool bw_validate(char *buf, unsigned long *data,
> struct rdt_resource *r)
> return true;
> }
>
> -int parse_bw_intel(struct rdt_parse_data *data, struct rdt_resource *r,
> - struct rdt_domain *d)
> +int parse_bw(struct rdt_parse_data *data, struct rdt_resource *r,
> + struct rdt_domain *d)
> {
> unsigned long bw_val;
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/internal.h
> b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/internal.h
> index 0b288b6fefd9..5919aae946ba 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/internal.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/internal.h
> @@ -470,10 +470,8 @@ struct rdt_resource {
>
> int parse_cbm(struct rdt_parse_data *data, struct rdt_resource *r,
> struct rdt_domain *d);
> -int parse_bw_intel(struct rdt_parse_data *data, struct rdt_resource *r,
> - struct rdt_domain *d);
> -int parse_bw_amd(struct rdt_parse_data *data, struct rdt_resource *r,
> - struct rdt_domain *d);
> +int parse_bw(struct rdt_parse_data *data, struct rdt_resource *r,
> + struct rdt_domain *d);
>
> extern struct mutex rdtgroup_mutex;
>
> --
> 2.19.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists