[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <871rnbsu57.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de>
Date: Fri, 22 May 2020 20:26:44 +0200
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
"Ahmed S. Darwish" <a.darwish@...utronix.de>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>,
"Sebastian A. Siewior" <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 10/25] seqlock: Add RST directives to kernel-doc code samples and notes
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> writes:
> On Fri, May 22, 2020 at 08:02:54PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>> On Tue, May 19, 2020 at 11:45:32PM +0200, Ahmed S. Darwish wrote:
>> > Mark all C code samples inside seqlock.h kernel-doc text with the RST
>> > 'code-block: c' directive. Sphinx won't properly format the example code
>> > and will produce noisy text indentation warnings otherwise.
>>
>> I so bloody hate RST.. and now it's infecting perfectly sane comments
>> and turning them into unreadable junk :-(
>
> The correct fix is, as always, to remove the kernel-doc marker.
Get over it already.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists