| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 22 May 2020 13:50:18 -0500
From: Dan Murphy <dmurphy@...com>
To: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>, <andrew@...n.ch>,
<hkallweit1@...il.com>, <davem@...emloft.net>, <robh@...nel.org>
CC: <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 4/4] net: dp83869: Add RGMII internal delay
configuration
Florian
On 5/22/20 11:13 AM, Florian Fainelli wrote:
>
> On 5/22/2020 5:25 AM, Dan Murphy wrote:
>> Add RGMII internal delay configuration for Rx and Tx.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Dan Murphy <dmurphy@...com>
>> ---
>> drivers/net/phy/dp83869.c | 101 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 101 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/phy/dp83869.c b/drivers/net/phy/dp83869.c
>> index cfb22a21a2e6..a9008d32e2b6 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/phy/dp83869.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/phy/dp83869.c
>> @@ -99,6 +99,14 @@
>> #define DP83869_OP_MODE_MII BIT(5)
>> #define DP83869_SGMII_RGMII_BRIDGE BIT(6)
>>
>> +/* RGMIIDCTL bits */
>> +#define DP83869_RGMII_TX_CLK_DELAY_SHIFT 4
>> +#define DP83869_RGMII_CLK_DELAY_INV 0
>> +
>> +static int dp83869_internal_delay[] = {250, 500, 750, 1000, 1250, 1500, 1750,
>> + 2000, 2250, 2500, 2750, 3000, 3250,
>> + 3500, 3750, 4000};
>> +
>> enum {
>> DP83869_PORT_MIRRORING_KEEP,
>> DP83869_PORT_MIRRORING_EN,
>> @@ -108,6 +116,8 @@ enum {
>> struct dp83869_private {
>> int tx_fifo_depth;
>> int rx_fifo_depth;
>> + u32 rx_id_delay;
>> + u32 tx_id_delay;
>> int io_impedance;
>> int port_mirroring;
>> bool rxctrl_strap_quirk;
>> @@ -182,6 +192,7 @@ static int dp83869_of_init(struct phy_device *phydev)
>> struct dp83869_private *dp83869 = phydev->priv;
>> struct device *dev = &phydev->mdio.dev;
>> struct device_node *of_node = dev->of_node;
>> + int delay_size = ARRAY_SIZE(dp83869_internal_delay);
>> int ret;
>>
>> if (!of_node)
>> @@ -232,6 +243,26 @@ static int dp83869_of_init(struct phy_device *phydev)
>> &dp83869->tx_fifo_depth))
>> dp83869->tx_fifo_depth = DP83869_PHYCR_FIFO_DEPTH_4_B_NIB;
>>
>> + dp83869->rx_id_delay = DP83869_RGMII_CLK_DELAY_INV;
>> + ret = of_property_read_u32(of_node, "rx-internal-delay-ps",
>> + &dp83869->rx_id_delay);
>> + if (!ret && dp83869->rx_id_delay > dp83869_internal_delay[delay_size]) {
>> + phydev_err(phydev,
>> + "rx-internal-delay value of %u out of range\n",
>> + dp83869->rx_id_delay);
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> + }
>> +
>> + dp83869->tx_id_delay = DP83869_RGMII_CLK_DELAY_INV;
>> + ret = of_property_read_u32(of_node, "tx-internal-delay-ps",
>> + &dp83869->tx_id_delay);
>> + if (!ret && dp83869->tx_id_delay > dp83869_internal_delay[delay_size]) {
>> + phydev_err(phydev,
>> + "tx-internal-delay value of %u out of range\n",
>> + dp83869->tx_id_delay);
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> + }
> This is the kind of validation that I would be expecting from the PHY
> library to do, in fact, since you use Device Tree standard property, I
> would expect you only need to pass the maximum delay value and some
> storage for your array of delays.
Actually the PHY library will return either the 0th index if the value
is to small or the max index if the value is to large
based on the array passed in so maybe this check is unnecessary.
>> +
>> return ret;
>> }
>> #else
>> @@ -270,6 +301,29 @@ static int dp83869_configure_rgmii(struct phy_device *phydev,
>> return ret;
>> }
>>
>> +static int dp83869_verify_rgmii_cfg(struct phy_device *phydev)
>> +{
>> + struct dp83869_private *dp83869 = phydev->priv;
>> +
>> + /* RX delay *must* be specified if internal delay of RX is used. */
>> + if ((phydev->interface == PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_RGMII_ID ||
>> + phydev->interface == PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_RGMII_RXID) &&
>> + dp83869->rx_id_delay == DP83869_RGMII_CLK_DELAY_INV) {
>> + phydev_err(phydev, "ti,rx-internal-delay must be specified\n");
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> + }
>> +
>> + /* TX delay *must* be specified if internal delay of TX is used. */
>> + if ((phydev->interface == PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_RGMII_ID ||
>> + phydev->interface == PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_RGMII_TXID) &&
>> + dp83869->tx_id_delay == DP83869_RGMII_CLK_DELAY_INV) {
>> + phydev_err(phydev, "ti,tx-internal-delay must be specified\n");
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> + }
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> static int dp83869_configure_mode(struct phy_device *phydev,
>> struct dp83869_private *dp83869)
>> {
>> @@ -371,6 +425,12 @@ static int dp83869_config_init(struct phy_device *phydev)
>> {
>> struct dp83869_private *dp83869 = phydev->priv;
>> int ret, val;
>> + int delay_size = ARRAY_SIZE(dp83869_internal_delay);
>> + int delay = 0;
>> +
>> + ret = dp83869_verify_rgmii_cfg(phydev);
>> + if (ret)
>> + return ret;
>>
>> ret = dp83869_configure_mode(phydev, dp83869);
>> if (ret)
>> @@ -394,6 +454,47 @@ static int dp83869_config_init(struct phy_device *phydev)
>> dp83869->clk_output_sel <<
>> DP83869_IO_MUX_CFG_CLK_O_SEL_SHIFT);
>>
>> + if (phy_interface_is_rgmii(phydev)) {
>> + val = phy_read_mmd(phydev, DP83869_DEVADDR, DP83869_RGMIICTL);
>> +
>> + val &= ~(DP83869_RGMII_TX_CLK_DELAY_EN | DP83869_RGMII_RX_CLK_DELAY_EN);
>> + if (phydev->interface == PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_RGMII_ID)
>> + val |= (DP83869_RGMII_TX_CLK_DELAY_EN | DP83869_RGMII_RX_CLK_DELAY_EN);
>> +
>> + if (phydev->interface == PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_RGMII_TXID)
>> + val |= DP83869_RGMII_TX_CLK_DELAY_EN;
>> +
>> + if (phydev->interface == PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_RGMII_RXID)
>> + val |= DP83869_RGMII_RX_CLK_DELAY_EN;
>> +
>> + phy_write_mmd(phydev, DP83869_DEVADDR, DP83869_RGMIICTL, val);
>> +
>> + if (dp83869->rx_id_delay) {
>> + val = phy_get_delay_index(phydev,
>> + &dp83869_internal_delay[0],
>> + delay_size,
>> + dp83869->rx_id_delay);
>> + if (val < 0)
>> + return val;
>> +
>> + delay |= val;
> Don't you need to do a bitwise AND with the maximum delay value
> supported by the range since you do a Read/Modify/Write operation here?
There is not RMW here. This is a write to the RGMIIDCTL register.
>
>> + }
>> +
>> + if (dp83869->tx_id_delay) {
>> + val = phy_get_delay_index(phydev,
>> + &dp83869_internal_delay[0],
>> + delay_size,
>> + dp83869->tx_id_delay);
>> + if (val < 0)
>> + return val;
>> +
>> + delay |= val << DP83869_RGMII_TX_CLK_DELAY_SHIFT;
> Likewise.
Same as above
Dan
Powered by blists - more mailing lists