lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 22 May 2020 21:07:23 +0200
From:   Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@...e.fr>
To:     Tiezhu Yang <yangtiezhu@...ngson.cn>
Cc:     Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>,
        Ray Jui <rjui@...adcom.com>,
        bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Xuefeng Li <lixuefeng@...ngson.cn>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] gpio: pxa: Fix return value of pxa_gpio_probe()

Tiezhu Yang <yangtiezhu@...ngson.cn> writes:

> When call function devm_platform_ioremap_resource(), we should use IS_ERR()
> to check the return value and return PTR_ERR() if failed.
>
> Fixes: 542c25b7a209 ("drivers: gpio: pxa: use devm_platform_ioremap_resource()")
> Signed-off-by: Tiezhu Yang <yangtiezhu@...ngson.cn>
> ---
>  drivers/gpio/gpio-pxa.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-pxa.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-pxa.c
> index 1361270..0cb6600 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-pxa.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-pxa.c
> @@ -660,8 +660,8 @@ static int pxa_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  	pchip->irq1 = irq1;
>  
>  	gpio_reg_base = devm_platform_ioremap_resource(pdev, 0);
> -	if (!gpio_reg_base)
> -		return -EINVAL;
> +	if (IS_ERR(gpio_reg_base))
> +		return PTR_ERR(gpio_reg_base);
As far as I know, devm_platform_ioremap_resource() could return NULL which is
not handled by this test (unless __devm_ioremap() semantics changed since I had
a look).

Therefore, this patch is incorrect, or rather incomplete.

Cheers.

-- 
Robert

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ