[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200522224711.GF25128@linux.intel.com>
Date: Fri, 22 May 2020 15:47:11 -0700
From: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@...el.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
vkuznets@...hat.com, Joerg Roedel <jroedel@...e.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 21/24] KVM: x86: always update CR3 in VMCB
On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 10:14:47PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 20/05/20 20:22, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> > As an alternative fix, what about marking VCPU_EXREG_CR3 dirty in
> > __set_sregs()? E.g.
> >
> > /*
> > * Loading vmcs02.GUEST_CR3 is handled by nested VM-Enter, but
> > * it can be explicitly dirtied by KVM_SET_SREGS.
> > */
> > if (is_guest_mode(vcpu) &&
> > !test_bit(VCPU_EXREG_CR3, (ulong *)&vcpu->arch.regs_dirty))
> >
> > There's already a dependency on __set_sregs() doing
> > kvm_register_mark_available() before kvm_mmu_reset_context(), i.e. the
> > code is already a bit kludgy. The dirty check would make the kludge less
> > subtle and provide explicit documentation.
>
> A comment in __set_sregs is certainly a good idea. But checking for
> dirty seems worse since the caching of CR3 is a bit special in this
> respect (it's never marked dirty).
That's why I thought it was so clever :-)
> This patch should probably be split too, so that the Fixes tags are
> separate for Intel and AMD.
That would be nice.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists