[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200522225923.GA2873@codeaurora.org>
Date: Fri, 22 May 2020 15:59:23 -0700
From: Guru Das Srinagesh <gurus@...eaurora.org>
To: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>
Cc: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
Uwe Kleine-König
<u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>, linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org,
Subbaraman Narayanamurthy <subbaram@...eaurora.org>,
David Collins <collinsd@...eaurora.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>,
Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@...aro.org>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v13 00/11] Convert PWM period and duty cycle to u64
On Fri, May 22, 2020 at 02:50:28PM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
> Looking at v14 I think there are no longer any discussions (looks like
> the last comment I thought was from v14 was actually on v13 and it seems
> to have been solved in v14 now) and there are Acked-bys for all the non-
> PWM patches, so there's nothing in the way of me applying this to the
> PWM tree. I can let it soak there for a few days and send out a stable
> branch if anyone needs it if there aren't any huge issues.
>
> Does that sound like a plan?
There is one ongoing discussion on v14 [1]: Daniel just gave me some
comments on the clps711x.c patch that I will address in the next
patchset. The plan you outlined sounds good to me - just let me send out
v15 which you may then pick up.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200521101934.j5ivjky4e6byveut@holly.lan/
Thank you.
Guru Das.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists