lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 22 May 2020 11:44:07 +0200
From:   Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:     "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>
Cc:     stern@...land.harvard.edu, parri.andrea@...il.com, will@...nel.org,
        boqun.feng@...il.com, npiggin@...il.com, dhowells@...hat.com,
        j.alglave@....ac.uk, luc.maranget@...ia.fr, akiyks@...il.com,
        dlustig@...dia.com, joel@...lfernandes.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
        andriin@...com
Subject: Re: Some -serious- BPF-related litmus tests

On Thu, May 21, 2020 at 05:38:50PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> Hello!
> 
> Just wanted to call your attention to some pretty cool and pretty serious
> litmus tests that Andrii did as part of his BPF ring-buffer work:
> 
> https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20200517195727.279322-3-andriin@fb.com/
> 
> Thoughts?

I find:

	smp_wmb()
	smp_store_release()

a _very_ weird construct. What is that supposed to even do?

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ