linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 06/15] ARM: berlin: Drop unneeded select of HAVE

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200522183657.00b33079@xhacker.debian>
Date:   Fri, 22 May 2020 18:36:57 +0800
From:   Jisheng Zhang <Jisheng.Zhang@...aptics.com>
To:     Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc:     Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>,
        SoC Team <soc@...nel.org>, Kevin Hilman <khilman@...nel.org>,
        Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>,
        Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 06/15] ARM: berlin: Drop unneeded select of HAVE_SMP

On Fri, 22 May 2020 12:34:43 +0200 Arnd Bergmann wrote:


> 
> 
> On Fri, May 22, 2020 at 12:13 PM Jisheng Zhang
> <Jisheng.Zhang@...aptics.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Arnd, Kevin, Olof,
> >
> > On Tue,  5 May 2020 17:07:13 +0200 Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> >  
> > >
> > >
> > > Support for Marvell Berlin SoCs depends on ARCH_MULTI_V7.
> > > As the latter selects HAVE_SMP, there is no need for MACH_BERLIN_BG2 to
> > > select HAVE_SMP.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>
> > > Cc: Jisheng Zhang <Jisheng.Zhang@...aptics.com>
> > > Cc: Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@...il.com>
> > > Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>  
> >
> > The patch looks good to me. I want to know what will be the mainline
> > path of this series. SoC maintainers take it then send A PR to arm-soc?
> > Or each SoC maintainers ack it, arm-soc will take the whole series?
> > If later, then
> >
> > Acked-by: Jisheng Zhang <Jisheng.Zhang@...aptics.com>
> >
> >
> > This is the first time I see a series touch different SoC platforms.  
> 
> I have already merged it. The normal way we do this is that platform
> maintainers can choose to merge individual patches when they
> are happy with them on the early review, or provide an Ack for
> them to get merged as a branch.
> 
> I picked up v2 of the series as there seemed to be a sufficient
> number of Acks and everyone that commented had agreed
> in principle.
> 

Nice. Thanks a lot