lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 22 May 2020 12:27:39 +0100
From:   Jon Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>
To:     <dinghao.liu@....edu.cn>
CC:     <kjlu@....edu>, Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@...dia.com>,
        Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>,
        Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
        Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
        <dmaengine@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dmaengine: tegra210-adma: Fix runtime PM imbalance on
 error


On 22/05/2020 11:57, dinghao.liu@....edu.cn wrote:
>>
>> On 22/05/2020 08:58, Dinghao Liu wrote:
>>> pm_runtime_get_sync() increments the runtime PM usage counter even
>>> when it returns an error code. Thus a pairing decrement is needed on
>>> the error handling path to keep the counter balanced.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Dinghao Liu <dinghao.liu@....edu.cn>
>>> ---
>>>  drivers/dma/tegra210-adma.c | 1 +
>>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/dma/tegra210-adma.c b/drivers/dma/tegra210-adma.c
>>> index c4ce5dfb149b..803e1f4d5dac 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/dma/tegra210-adma.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/dma/tegra210-adma.c
>>> @@ -658,6 +658,7 @@ static int tegra_adma_alloc_chan_resources(struct dma_chan *dc)
>>>  
>>>  	ret = pm_runtime_get_sync(tdc2dev(tdc));
>>>  	if (ret < 0) {
>>> +		pm_runtime_put_sync(tdc2dev(tdc));
>>>  		free_irq(tdc->irq, tdc);
>>>  		return ret;
>>>  	}
>>>
>>
>>
>> There is another place in probe that needs to be fixed as well. Can you
>> correct this while you are at it?
>>
>> Thanks
>> Jon
>>
>> -- 
>> nvpublic
> 
> Sure. I have sent a patch to fix PM imbalance in tegra_adma_probe().


You should only send one patch to fix both instances as it is the same
driver. It is impossible to figure out that two patches with the same
$subject are different.

Jon

-- 
nvpublic

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ