lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 22 May 2020 17:29:13 +0530
From:   Jishnu Prakash <jprakash@...eaurora.org>
To:     Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
Cc:     agross@...nel.org, Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
        devicetree <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@...omium.org>,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>,
        Amit Kucheria <amit.kucheria@...durent.com>,
        smohanad@...eaurora.org, kgunda@...eaurora.org,
        aghayal@...eaurora.org, Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>,
        Hartmut Knaack <knaack.h@....de>,
        Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
        Peter Meerwald-Stadler <pmeerw@...erw.net>,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-iio <linux-iio@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-arm-msm-owner@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 5/5] iio: adc: Clean up ADC code common to PMIC5 and
 PMIC7

Hi Andy,

On 5/13/2020 3:21 PM, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 12:24 PM Jishnu Prakash <jprakash@...eaurora.org> wrote:
>> This commit includes the following changes:
>> Add a common function used for read_raw callback for
>> both PMIC5 and PMIC7 ADCs.
>> Add exit function for ADC.
>> Add info_property under adc_data to more efficiently
>> distinguish PMIC5 and PMIC7 ADCs.
> Something happened to the editor settings. We have lines up to 72
> (recommended) characters.
In this case, I just meant to put each change on a different line. I'll 
fix it in the next post.
>
> ...
>
>> @@ -512,6 +518,7 @@ static int adc5_read_raw(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
>>                          &adc5_prescale_ratios[prop->prescale],
>>                          adc->data,
>>                          adc_code_volt, val);
>> +
>>                  if (ret)
>>                          return ret;
>>
> Unrelated.
I'll remove it in the next post.
>

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ