lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200522131242.GI5801@sirena.org.uk>
Date:   Fri, 22 May 2020 14:12:42 +0100
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:     Shengjiu Wang <shengjiu.wang@...il.com>
Cc:     Lucas Stach <l.stach@...gutronix.de>,
        Shengjiu Wang <shengjiu.wang@....com>,
        Timur Tabi <timur@...nel.org>,
        Nicolin Chen <nicoleotsuka@...il.com>,
        Xiubo Li <Xiubo.Lee@...il.com>,
        Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>,
        Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>, perex@...ex.cz,
        Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>, shawnguo@...nel.org,
        s.hauer@...gutronix.de, kernel@...gutronix.de, linux-imx@....com,
        Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@...aro.org>,
        Linux-ALSA <alsa-devel@...a-project.org>,
        linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-media@...r.kernel.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
        linaro-mm-sig@...ts.linaro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ASoC: fsl: imx-pcm-dma: Don't request dma channel in
 probe

On Thu, May 21, 2020 at 07:30:04PM +0800, Shengjiu Wang wrote:
> On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 8:38 PM Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org> wrote:

> > Other drivers having problems means those drivers should be fixed, not
> > that we should copy the problems.  In the case of the PXA driver that's
> > very old code which predates deferred probe by I'd guess a decade.

> Thanks.

> For the FE-BE case, do you have any suggestion for how fix it?

> With DMA1->ASRC->DMA2->ESAI case, the DMA1->ASRC->DMA2
> is in FE,  ESAI is in BE.  When ESAI drvier probe,  DMA3 channel is
> created with ESAI's "dma:tx" (DMA3 channel
> is not used in this FE-BE case).    When FE-BE startup, DMA2
> channel is created, it needs the ESAI's "dma:tx", so the warning
> comes out.

Not really TBH, this seems like another one of those csaes where DPCM is
creaking at the seams :/

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ