[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMj1kXHogO=3wAyZPi9WtHP9++N5KH6OjNgY_CQ_o8nZJ5jjVA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 22 May 2020 15:44:21 +0200
From: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Cc: linux-efi <linux-efi@...r.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Arvind Sankar <nivedita@...m.mit.edu>,
Benjamin Thiel <b.thiel@...teo.de>,
Dave Young <dyoung@...hat.com>,
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@....de>,
Javier Martinez Canillas <javierm@...hat.com>,
Jerry Snitselaar <jsnitsel@...hat.com>,
Lenny Szubowicz <lszubowi@...hat.com>,
ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
Loic Yhuel <loic.yhuel@...il.com>,
Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...gle.com>,
Mike Lothian <mike@...eburn.co.uk>,
Punit Agrawal <punit1.agrawal@...hiba.co.jp>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL 0/7] EFI fixes for v5.7
On Fri, 22 May 2020 at 15:40, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de> wrote:
>
> On Fri, May 22, 2020 at 03:06:20PM +0200, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> > Ping?
>
> Did you want to make your tags unique from the next pull request onwards
> and I were supposed to pull this one as is?
>
What usually happens is that Ingo applies the patches piecemeal,
ignoring the tag altogether, so without any coordination between you
as x86 maintainers or communication back to me, that is what i was
expecting to happen this time as well.
Note that I have another PR pending since two weeks ago [0].
So if you want to start dealing with the EFI trees in a different way
from now on, that is perfectly fine with me, but please align with
Ingo and Thomas first.
Thanks,
Ard.
[0] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-efi/20200508180157.1816-1-ardb@kernel.org/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists