linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] dt-bindings: iio: imu: bmi160: convert txt format to yaml

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 22 May 2020 17:59:11 +0300
From:   Daniel Baluta <daniel.baluta@....com>
To:     Jonathan Albrieux <jonathan.albrieux@...il.com>
Cc:     Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>,
        Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        "open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS" 
        <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, Hartmut Knaack <knaack.h@....de>,
        Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
        "open list:IIO SUBSYSTEM AND DRIVERS" <linux-iio@...r.kernel.org>,
        Peter Meerwald-Stadler <pmeerw@...erw.net>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] dt-bindings: iio: imu: bmi160: convert txt format
 to yaml


On 22.05.2020 17:26, Jonathan Albrieux wrote:
> On Fri, May 22, 2020 at 01:47:21PM +0300, Daniel Baluta wrote:
>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>> +maintainers:
>>>>>>> +  - can't find a mantainer, author is Daniel Baluta <daniel.baluta@...el.com>
>>>>>> Daniel is still active in the kernel, just not at Intel any more. +CC
>>>>> Oh ok thank you! Daniel are you still maintaining this driver?
>> I can do reviews if requested but I'm not actively maintaining this driver.
>> If anyone wants
>>
>> to take this over, will be more than happy.
>>
>>
>> Other than that we can add my gmail address: Daniel Baluta
>> <daniel.baluta@...il.com>
>>
>>
>>
> Well if you'd like to review this patch I'd really appreciate :-)
> Forgive me for not having understood your answer regarding the maintainer
> field, can I add you to this binding as maintainer or are you saying to
> not add you? Thank you and sorry for the repeated question,
>
>

OK, so I think would be better not to add me as a maintainer because

this would set some expecation from people, and I most likely won't

have time to met them.


Can you instead add the linux-iio mailing list as a maintainer, not sure

if this is a common practice though.