[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200522162647.GW317569@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Fri, 22 May 2020 18:26:47 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@...aro.org>
Cc: sumit.garg@...aro.org, jason.wessel@...driver.com,
dianders@...omium.org, kgdb-bugreport@...ts.sourceforge.net,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, patches@...aro.org, pmladek@...e.com,
sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] debug: Convert dbg_slave_lock to an atomic
On Fri, May 22, 2020 at 03:55:09PM +0100, Daniel Thompson wrote:
> +static atomic_t slaves_must_spin;
> + if (!atomic_read(&slaves_must_spin))
> + atomic_set(&slaves_must_spin, 1);
> + atomic_set(&slaves_must_spin, 0);
There is no atomic operation there; this is pointless use of atomic_t.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists