[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <035bf8ad-3ef0-8314-ae5c-a94a24c230c8@ti.com>
Date: Fri, 22 May 2020 11:47:34 -0500
From: Suman Anna <s-anna@...com>
To: Paul Cercueil <paul@...pouillou.net>,
Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
Ohad Ben-Cohen <ohad@...ery.com>,
Arnaud Pouliquen <arnaud.pouliquen@...com>
CC: <od@...c.me>, <linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org>,
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Tero Kristo <t-kristo@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 3/5] remoteproc: Add support for runtime PM
Hi Paul,
On 5/15/20 5:43 AM, Paul Cercueil wrote:
> Call pm_runtime_get_sync() before the firmware is loaded, and
> pm_runtime_put() after the remote processor has been stopped.
>
> Even though the remoteproc device has no PM callbacks, this allows the
> parent device's PM callbacks to be properly called.
I see this patch staged now for 5.8, and the latest -next branch has
broken the pm-runtime autosuspend feature we have in the OMAP remoteproc
driver. See commit 5f31b232c674 ("remoteproc/omap: Add support for
runtime auto-suspend/resume").
What was the original purpose of this patch, because there can be
differing backends across different SoCs.
regards
Suman
>
> Signed-off-by: Paul Cercueil <paul@...pouillou.net>
> ---
>
> Notes:
> v2-v4: No change
> v5: Move calls to prepare/unprepare to rproc_fw_boot/rproc_shutdown
> v6: Instead of prepare/unprepare callbacks, use PM runtime callbacks
> v7: Check return value of pm_runtime_get_sync()
>
> drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c | 17 ++++++++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
> index a7f96bc98406..e33d1ef27981 100644
> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
> @@ -29,6 +29,7 @@
> #include <linux/devcoredump.h>
> #include <linux/rculist.h>
> #include <linux/remoteproc.h>
> +#include <linux/pm_runtime.h>
> #include <linux/iommu.h>
> #include <linux/idr.h>
> #include <linux/elf.h>
> @@ -1382,6 +1383,12 @@ static int rproc_fw_boot(struct rproc *rproc, const struct firmware *fw)
> if (ret)
> return ret;
>
> + ret = pm_runtime_get_sync(dev);
> + if (ret < 0) {
> + dev_err(dev, "pm_runtime_get_sync failed: %d\n", ret);
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> dev_info(dev, "Booting fw image %s, size %zd\n", name, fw->size);
>
> /*
> @@ -1391,7 +1398,7 @@ static int rproc_fw_boot(struct rproc *rproc, const struct firmware *fw)
> ret = rproc_enable_iommu(rproc);
> if (ret) {
> dev_err(dev, "can't enable iommu: %d\n", ret);
> - return ret;
> + goto put_pm_runtime;
> }
>
> rproc->bootaddr = rproc_get_boot_addr(rproc, fw);
> @@ -1435,6 +1442,8 @@ static int rproc_fw_boot(struct rproc *rproc, const struct firmware *fw)
> rproc->table_ptr = NULL;
> disable_iommu:
> rproc_disable_iommu(rproc);
> +put_pm_runtime:
> + pm_runtime_put(dev);
> return ret;
> }
>
> @@ -1840,6 +1849,8 @@ void rproc_shutdown(struct rproc *rproc)
>
> rproc_disable_iommu(rproc);
>
> + pm_runtime_put(dev);
> +
> /* Free the copy of the resource table */
> kfree(rproc->cached_table);
> rproc->cached_table = NULL;
> @@ -2118,6 +2129,9 @@ struct rproc *rproc_alloc(struct device *dev, const char *name,
>
> rproc->state = RPROC_OFFLINE;
>
> + pm_runtime_no_callbacks(&rproc->dev);
> + pm_runtime_enable(&rproc->dev);
> +
> return rproc;
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(rproc_alloc);
> @@ -2133,6 +2147,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(rproc_alloc);
> */
> void rproc_free(struct rproc *rproc)
> {
> + pm_runtime_disable(&rproc->dev);
> put_device(&rproc->dev);
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(rproc_free);
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists