lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Sat, 23 May 2020 18:10:25 +0800 (GMT+08:00)
To:     "Bean Huo (beanhuo)" <>
Cc:     "" <>,
        "Alim Akhtar" <>,
        "Avri Altman" <>,
        "James E.J. Bottomley" <>,
        "Martin K. Petersen" <>,
        "Bart Van Assche" <>,
        "Can Guo" <>,
        "" <>,
        "" <>
Subject: Re: RE: RE: [EXT] [PATCH] scsi: ufs-bsg: Fix runtime PM imbalance
 on error

> Hi, Dinghao
> > Thank you for your advice! Moving original pm_runtime_put_sync() to after
> > "out" label will influence an error path branched from
> > ups_bsg_verify_query_size(). So I think changing "goto out" to "break" is a good
> > idea. But in this case we may execute an extra
> > sg_copy_from_buffer() and an extra kfree() compared with unpatched version.
> > Does this matter?
> > 
> What do you mean " unpatched version "? 
> I see, below goto will bypass sg_copy_from_buffer() and an extra kfree()
> In case ufs_bsg_alloc_desc_buffer() fails. 

That's exactly what I want to express. If using "break" is OK I will send
a new patch to fix this problem.

> Bean


Powered by blists - more mailing lists