linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] drivers: provide devm_platform_request

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200523160828.GE3459@ninjato>
Date:   Sat, 23 May 2020 18:08:29 +0200
From:   Wolfram Sang <wsa@...nel.org>
To:     Dejin Zheng <zhengdejin5@...il.com>
Cc:     gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, rafael@...nel.org,
        f.fainelli@...il.com, rjui@...adcom.com, sbranden@...adcom.com,
        michal.simek@...inx.com, baruch@...s.co.il, paul@...pouillou.net,
        khilman@...libre.com, shawnguo@...nel.org, festevam@...il.com,
        vz@...ia.com, heiko@...ech.de, linus.walleij@...aro.org,
        baohua@...nel.org, ardb@...nel.org, linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] drivers: provide devm_platform_request_irq()

On Sat, May 23, 2020 at 10:51:55PM +0800, Dejin Zheng wrote:
> It will call devm_request_irq() after platform_get_irq() function
> in many drivers, sometimes, it is not right for the error handling
> of these two functions in some drivers. so provide this function
> to simplify the driver.
> 
> the first patch will provide devm_platform_request_irq(), and the
> other patch will convert to devm_platform_request_irq() in some
> i2c bus dirver.
> 
> v1 -> v2:
> 	- I give up this series of patches in v1 version. I resend this
> 	  patches v2 by that discussion:
> 	  https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/linux-i2c/patch/20200520144821.8069-1-zhengdejin5@gmail.com/
> 	  The patch content has not changed.

I don't understand. v1 has been nacked because of technical reasons. How
did the discussion above change the situation? Am I missing something?

> 
> Dejin Zheng (2):
>   drivers: provide devm_platform_request_irq()
>   i2c: busses: convert to devm_platform_request_irq()
> 
>  drivers/base/platform.c            | 33 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-bcm-kona.c  | 16 +++------------
>  drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-cadence.c   | 10 +++------
>  drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-digicolor.c | 10 +++------
>  drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-emev2.c     |  5 ++---
>  drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-jz4780.c    |  5 ++---
>  drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-meson.c     | 13 ++++--------
>  drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-mxs.c       |  9 +++-----
>  drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-pnx.c       |  9 ++------
>  drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-rcar.c      |  9 +++-----
>  drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-rk3x.c      | 14 +++----------
>  drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-sirf.c      | 10 ++-------
>  drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-stu300.c    |  4 ++--
>  drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-synquacer.c | 12 +++--------
>  include/linux/platform_device.h    |  4 ++++
>  15 files changed, 72 insertions(+), 91 deletions(-)
> 
> -- 
> 2.25.0
> 

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)