[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200523064643.GA27431@zn.tnic>
Date: Sat, 23 May 2020 08:46:43 +0200
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
elver@...gle.com
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the tip tree
On Fri, May 22, 2020 at 05:12:23PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> Marco, Thomas, is there any better setup I can provide Stephen? Or
> is the next-20200519 -rcu tree the best we have right now?
I've queued the fixes yesterday into tip:locking/kcsan and tglx said
something about you having to rebase anyway. I guess you can find him on
IRC at some point later. :)
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette
Powered by blists - more mailing lists