[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <61CC2BC414934749BD9F5BF3D5D94044986D1159@ORSMSX112.amr.corp.intel.com>
Date: Sat, 23 May 2020 07:13:21 +0000
From: "Kirsher, Jeffrey T" <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>
To: Hari <harichandrakanthan@...il.com>,
"davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"kuba@...nel.org" <kuba@...nel.org>
CC: "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org" <intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH] Fix typo in the comment
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Intel-wired-lan <intel-wired-lan-bounces@...osl.org> On Behalf Of Hari
> Sent: Friday, May 22, 2020 03:30
> To: davem@...emloft.net; kuba@...nel.org
> Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org; intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org; linux-
> kernel@...r.kernel.org; Hari <harichandrakanthan@...il.com>
> Subject: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH] Fix typo in the comment
[Kirsher, Jeffrey T]
Please fix the title to "e1000: Fix typo in the comment", other than that your patch looks fine and I will add it to my queue after the title of your patch is fixed.
>
> Continuous Double "the" in a comment. Changed it to single "the"
>
> Signed-off-by: Hari <harichandrakanthan@...il.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000/e1000_hw.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000/e1000_hw.c
> b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000/e1000_hw.c
> index 48428d6a00be..623e516a9630 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000/e1000_hw.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000/e1000_hw.c
> @@ -3960,7 +3960,7 @@ static s32 e1000_do_read_eeprom(struct e1000_hw
> *hw, u16 offset, u16 words,
> * @hw: Struct containing variables accessed by shared code
> *
> * Reads the first 64 16 bit words of the EEPROM and sums the values read.
> - * If the the sum of the 64 16 bit words is 0xBABA, the EEPROM's checksum is
> + * If the sum of the 64 16 bit words is 0xBABA, the EEPROM's checksum is
> * valid.
> */
> s32 e1000_validate_eeprom_checksum(struct e1000_hw *hw)
> --
> 2.17.1
>
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-wired-lan mailing list
> Intel-wired-lan@...osl.org
> https://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-wired-lan
Powered by blists - more mailing lists