lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Sun, 24 May 2020 15:39:47 +0100
From:   Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>
To:     Alexandru Ardelean <alexandru.ardelean@...log.com>
Cc:     <linux-iio@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        <amit.kucheria@...durent.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] iio: light: tsl2563: pass iio device as i2c_client
 private data

On Fri, 22 May 2020 10:08:01 +0300
Alexandru Ardelean <alexandru.ardelean@...log.com> wrote:

> We may want to get rid of the iio_priv_to_dev() helper. That's a bit
> uncertain at this point. The reason is that we will hide some of the
> members of the iio_dev structure (to prevent drivers from accessing them
> directly), and that will also mean hiding the implementation of the
> iio_priv_to_dev() helper inside the IIO core.
> 
> Hiding the implementation of iio_priv_to_dev() implies that some fast-paths
> may not be fast anymore, so a general idea is to try to get rid of the
> iio_priv_to_dev() altogether.
> 
> For this driver, it implies passing the IIO device on the i2c client
> private data. The implementation of iio_priv() will not be affected by the
> rework/hiding of iio_priv_to_dev().
> 
> Signed-off-by: Alexandru Ardelean <alexandru.ardelean@...log.com>

Applied. Thanks,

J
> ---
>  drivers/iio/light/tsl2563.c | 12 +++++++-----
>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/light/tsl2563.c b/drivers/iio/light/tsl2563.c
> index 27a5c28aac7f..2987a7a79a97 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/light/tsl2563.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/light/tsl2563.c
> @@ -713,7 +713,7 @@ static int tsl2563_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
>  
>  	chip = iio_priv(indio_dev);
>  
> -	i2c_set_clientdata(client, chip);
> +	i2c_set_clientdata(client, indio_dev);
>  	chip->client = client;
>  
>  	err = tsl2563_detect(chip);
> @@ -797,8 +797,8 @@ static int tsl2563_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
>  
>  static int tsl2563_remove(struct i2c_client *client)
>  {
> -	struct tsl2563_chip *chip = i2c_get_clientdata(client);
> -	struct iio_dev *indio_dev = iio_priv_to_dev(chip);
> +	struct iio_dev *indio_dev = i2c_get_clientdata(client);
> +	struct tsl2563_chip *chip = iio_priv(indio_dev);
>  
>  	iio_device_unregister(indio_dev);
>  	if (!chip->int_enabled)
> @@ -816,7 +816,8 @@ static int tsl2563_remove(struct i2c_client *client)
>  #ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP
>  static int tsl2563_suspend(struct device *dev)
>  {
> -	struct tsl2563_chip *chip = i2c_get_clientdata(to_i2c_client(dev));
> +	struct iio_dev *indio_dev = i2c_get_clientdata(to_i2c_client(dev));
> +	struct tsl2563_chip *chip = iio_priv(indio_dev);
>  	int ret;
>  
>  	mutex_lock(&chip->lock);
> @@ -834,7 +835,8 @@ static int tsl2563_suspend(struct device *dev)
>  
>  static int tsl2563_resume(struct device *dev)
>  {
> -	struct tsl2563_chip *chip = i2c_get_clientdata(to_i2c_client(dev));
> +	struct iio_dev *indio_dev = i2c_get_clientdata(to_i2c_client(dev));
> +	struct tsl2563_chip *chip = iio_priv(indio_dev);
>  	int ret;
>  
>  	mutex_lock(&chip->lock);

Powered by blists - more mailing lists