linux-kernel - [GIT pull] sched/urgent for v5.7-rc7

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <159033288238.21635.76261789367356025.tglx@nanos.tec.linutronix.de>
Date:   Sun, 24 May 2020 15:08:02 -0000
From:   Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To:     Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org
Subject: [GIT pull] sched/urgent for v5.7-rc7

Linus,

please pull the latest sched/urgent branch from:

   git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip.git sched-urgent-2020-05-24

up to:  39f23ce07b93: sched/fair: Fix unthrottle_cfs_rq() for leaf_cfs_rq list

A set of fixes for the scheduler:

 - Fix handling of throttled parents in enqueue_task_fair() completely. The
   recent fix overlooked a corner case where the first iteration terminates
   do a entiry being on rq which makes the list management incomplete and
   later triggers the assertion which checks for completeness.

 - Fix a similar problem in unthrottle_cfs_rq().

 - Show the correct uclamp values in procfs which prints the effective
   value twice instead of requested and effective.

Thanks,

	tglx

------------------>
Pavankumar Kondeti (1):
      sched/debug: Fix requested task uclamp values shown in procfs

Phil Auld (1):
      sched/fair: Fix enqueue_task_fair() warning some more

Vincent Guittot (1):
      sched/fair: Fix unthrottle_cfs_rq() for leaf_cfs_rq list


 kernel/sched/debug.c |  4 ++--
 kernel/sched/fair.c  | 49 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
 2 files changed, 39 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/sched/debug.c b/kernel/sched/debug.c
index a562df57a86e..239970b991c0 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/debug.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/debug.c
@@ -948,8 +948,8 @@ void proc_sched_show_task(struct task_struct *p, struct pid_namespace *ns,
 	P(se.avg.util_est.enqueued);
 #endif
 #ifdef CONFIG_UCLAMP_TASK
-	__PS("uclamp.min", p->uclamp[UCLAMP_MIN].value);
-	__PS("uclamp.max", p->uclamp[UCLAMP_MAX].value);
+	__PS("uclamp.min", p->uclamp_req[UCLAMP_MIN].value);
+	__PS("uclamp.max", p->uclamp_req[UCLAMP_MAX].value);
 	__PS("effective uclamp.min", uclamp_eff_value(p, UCLAMP_MIN));
 	__PS("effective uclamp.max", uclamp_eff_value(p, UCLAMP_MAX));
 #endif
diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index 02f323b85b6d..538ba5d94e99 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -4774,7 +4774,6 @@ void unthrottle_cfs_rq(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq)
 	struct rq *rq = rq_of(cfs_rq);
 	struct cfs_bandwidth *cfs_b = tg_cfs_bandwidth(cfs_rq->tg);
 	struct sched_entity *se;
-	int enqueue = 1;
 	long task_delta, idle_task_delta;
 
 	se = cfs_rq->tg->se[cpu_of(rq)];
@@ -4798,26 +4797,44 @@ void unthrottle_cfs_rq(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq)
 	idle_task_delta = cfs_rq->idle_h_nr_running;
 	for_each_sched_entity(se) {
 		if (se->on_rq)
-			enqueue = 0;
+			break;
+		cfs_rq = cfs_rq_of(se);
+		enqueue_entity(cfs_rq, se, ENQUEUE_WAKEUP);
+
+		cfs_rq->h_nr_running += task_delta;
+		cfs_rq->idle_h_nr_running += idle_task_delta;
+
+		/* end evaluation on encountering a throttled cfs_rq */
+		if (cfs_rq_throttled(cfs_rq))
+			goto unthrottle_throttle;
+	}
 
+	for_each_sched_entity(se) {
 		cfs_rq = cfs_rq_of(se);
-		if (enqueue) {
-			enqueue_entity(cfs_rq, se, ENQUEUE_WAKEUP);
-		} else {
-			update_load_avg(cfs_rq, se, 0);
-			se_update_runnable(se);
-		}
+
+		update_load_avg(cfs_rq, se, UPDATE_TG);
+		se_update_runnable(se);
 
 		cfs_rq->h_nr_running += task_delta;
 		cfs_rq->idle_h_nr_running += idle_task_delta;
 
+
+		/* end evaluation on encountering a throttled cfs_rq */
 		if (cfs_rq_throttled(cfs_rq))
-			break;
+			goto unthrottle_throttle;
+
+		/*
+		 * One parent has been throttled and cfs_rq removed from the
+		 * list. Add it back to not break the leaf list.
+		 */
+		if (throttled_hierarchy(cfs_rq))
+			list_add_leaf_cfs_rq(cfs_rq);
 	}
 
-	if (!se)
-		add_nr_running(rq, task_delta);
+	/* At this point se is NULL and we are at root level*/
+	add_nr_running(rq, task_delta);
 
+unthrottle_throttle:
 	/*
 	 * The cfs_rq_throttled() breaks in the above iteration can result in
 	 * incomplete leaf list maintenance, resulting in triggering the
@@ -4826,7 +4843,8 @@ void unthrottle_cfs_rq(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq)
 	for_each_sched_entity(se) {
 		cfs_rq = cfs_rq_of(se);
 
-		list_add_leaf_cfs_rq(cfs_rq);
+		if (list_add_leaf_cfs_rq(cfs_rq))
+			break;
 	}
 
 	assert_list_leaf_cfs_rq(rq);
@@ -5479,6 +5497,13 @@ enqueue_task_fair(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int flags)
 		/* end evaluation on encountering a throttled cfs_rq */
 		if (cfs_rq_throttled(cfs_rq))
 			goto enqueue_throttle;
+
+               /*
+                * One parent has been throttled and cfs_rq removed from the
+                * list. Add it back to not break the leaf list.
+                */
+               if (throttled_hierarchy(cfs_rq))
+                       list_add_leaf_cfs_rq(cfs_rq);
 	}
 
 enqueue_throttle: