[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200524173711.ofprgoueyimhkowj@pengutronix.de>
Date: Sun, 24 May 2020 19:37:11 +0200
From: Uwe Kleine-König
<u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
To: Paul Cercueil <paul@...pouillou.net>
Cc: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>, od@...c.me,
linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] pwm: jz4740: Add support for the JZ4725B
On Mon, Apr 13, 2020 at 02:14:45PM +0200, Paul Cercueil wrote:
> The PWM hardware in the JZ4725B works the same as in the JZ4740, but has
> only six channels available.
>
> Signed-off-by: Paul Cercueil <paul@...pouillou.net>
> ---
>
> Notes:
> I did not add documentation for the new jz4725b-pwm compatible
> string on purpose. The reason is that the documentation file
> for the Timer/Counter Unit (TCU) of Ingenic SoCs will be
> completely rewritten from .txt to YAML in a separate patchset.
>
> drivers/pwm/pwm-jz4740.c | 20 +++++++++++++++++---
> 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-jz4740.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-jz4740.c
> index f566f9d248d6..bb27934fb6c2 100644
> --- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-jz4740.c
> +++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-jz4740.c
> @@ -22,6 +22,10 @@
>
> #define NUM_PWM 8
>
> +struct soc_info {
> + unsigned int num_pwms;
> +};
> +
> struct jz4740_pwm_chip {
> struct pwm_chip chip;
> struct regmap *map;
> @@ -36,7 +40,7 @@ static bool jz4740_pwm_can_use_chn(struct jz4740_pwm_chip *jz,
> unsigned int channel)
> {
> /* Enable all TCU channels for PWM use by default except channels 0/1 */
> - u32 pwm_channels_mask = GENMASK(NUM_PWM - 1, 2);
> + u32 pwm_channels_mask = GENMASK(jz->chip.npwm - 1, 2);
>
> device_property_read_u32(jz->chip.dev->parent,
> "ingenic,pwm-channels-mask",
> @@ -214,6 +218,7 @@ static int jz4740_pwm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> {
> struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> struct jz4740_pwm_chip *jz4740;
> + const struct soc_info *info = device_get_match_data(dev);
>
> jz4740 = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*jz4740), GFP_KERNEL);
> if (!jz4740)
> @@ -227,8 +232,8 @@ static int jz4740_pwm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>
> jz4740->chip.dev = dev;
> jz4740->chip.ops = &jz4740_pwm_ops;
> - jz4740->chip.npwm = NUM_PWM;
> jz4740->chip.base = -1;
> + jz4740->chip.npwm = info ? info->num_pwms : NUM_PWM;
Can info be actually NULL? I don't think so, so you can just use
info->num_pwms here and drop the definition of NUM_PWM.
> jz4740->chip.of_xlate = of_pwm_xlate_with_flags;
> jz4740->chip.of_pwm_n_cells = 3;
>
Best regards
Uwe
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König |
Industrial Linux Solutions | https://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Powered by blists - more mailing lists