[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200524174434.tcnszokabt2ymh7x@pengutronix.de>
Date: Sun, 24 May 2020 19:44:34 +0200
From: Uwe Kleine-König
<u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
To: Jitao Shi <jitao.shi@...iatek.com>
Cc: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
srv_heupstream@...iatek.com, yingjoe.chen@...iatek.com,
eddie.huang@...iatek.com, cawa.cheng@...iatek.com,
bibby.hsieh@...iatek.com, ck.hu@...iatek.com, stonea168@....com,
huijuan.xie@...iatek.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] pwm: mtk_disp: implement .apply()
Hello,
On Fri, Apr 10, 2020 at 11:19:55AM +0800, Jitao Shi wrote:
> implement the apply() for pwm.
>
> Fix the clock clk_prepare_enable and clk_disable_unprepare mismatch,
> switch the driver to support the ->apply() method.
Adding support for get_state is a separate change.
Other than that this patch looks more complicated that I would expect,
I think you can make this easier to understand/review by moving the
mismatch to a separate patch, too.
Can you please respin with these hints in mind, then I'm willing to
invest some time for a deeper review. In general it's very welcome to
convert the mtk-disp driver to the atomic API. Thanks for addressing
that.
Best regards
Uwe
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König |
Industrial Linux Solutions | https://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Powered by blists - more mailing lists