[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d00a5503d271e127c948e3352a51d9646136a6d1.camel@perches.com>
Date: Sun, 24 May 2020 11:49:34 -0700
From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.SAKURA.ne.jp>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>,
Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] printk: Remove pr_cont_once()
On Mon, 2020-05-25 at 00:32 +0900, Tetsuo Handa wrote:
> pr_cont_once() does not make sense; at least emitting module name using
> pr_fmt() into middle of a line (after e.g. pr_info_once()) does not make
> sense. Let's remove unused pr_cont_once().
Right, thanks.
It's nearly a decade old cut'n'paste defect and
no one has ever used it or noticed it until now.
> Signed-off-by: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.SAKURA.ne.jp>
> Cc: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
> ---
> include/linux/printk.h | 3 +--
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/printk.h b/include/linux/printk.h
> index 2562ffb438ed..4c565871f659 100644
> --- a/include/linux/printk.h
> +++ b/include/linux/printk.h
> @@ -476,8 +476,7 @@ extern int kptr_restrict;
> printk_once(KERN_NOTICE pr_fmt(fmt), ##__VA_ARGS__)
> #define pr_info_once(fmt, ...) \
> printk_once(KERN_INFO pr_fmt(fmt), ##__VA_ARGS__)
> -#define pr_cont_once(fmt, ...) \
> - printk_once(KERN_CONT pr_fmt(fmt), ##__VA_ARGS__)
> +/* no pr_cont_once, don't do that... */
>
> #if defined(DEBUG) || defined(CONFIG_TWIST_ALWAYS_EVALUATE_DEBUG_PRINTK)
> #define pr_devel_once(fmt, ...) \
Powered by blists - more mailing lists