lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Sun, 24 May 2020 20:56:28 +0200
From:   Uwe Kleine-König 
        <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
To:     Paul Cercueil <paul@...pouillou.net>
Cc:     Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>, od@...c.me,
        linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] pwm: jz4740: Add support for the JZ4725B

Hello Paul,

On Sun, May 24, 2020 at 07:51:23PM +0200, Paul Cercueil wrote:
> Le dim. 24 mai 2020 à 19:37, Uwe Kleine-König
> <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de> a écrit :
> > On Mon, Apr 13, 2020 at 02:14:45PM +0200, Paul Cercueil wrote:
> > >  @@ -214,6 +218,7 @@ static int jz4740_pwm_probe(struct
> > > platform_device *pdev)
> > >   {
> > >   	struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> > >   	struct jz4740_pwm_chip *jz4740;
> > >  +	const struct soc_info *info = device_get_match_data(dev);
> > > 
> > >   	jz4740 = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*jz4740), GFP_KERNEL);
> > >   	if (!jz4740)
> > >  @@ -227,8 +232,8 @@ static int jz4740_pwm_probe(struct
> > > platform_device *pdev)
> > > 
> > >   	jz4740->chip.dev = dev;
> > >   	jz4740->chip.ops = &jz4740_pwm_ops;
> > >  -	jz4740->chip.npwm = NUM_PWM;
> > >   	jz4740->chip.base = -1;
> > >  +	jz4740->chip.npwm = info ? info->num_pwms : NUM_PWM;
> > 
> > Can info be actually NULL? I don't think so, so you can just use
> > info->num_pwms here and drop the definition of NUM_PWM.
> 
> In *theory* it can be NULL if the kernel is configured without CONFIG_OF,
> which will never happen on any board supported by this driver. I can add a
> dependency on CONFIG_OF in V2, then use info->num_pwms there.

I'd prefer just something like:

	if (!info)
		return -EINVAL;

instead of a dependency on CONFIG_OF.

Best regards
Uwe

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           | Uwe Kleine-König            |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | https://www.pengutronix.de/ |

Powered by blists - more mailing lists