lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 25 May 2020 09:31:40 +0200
From:   Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
To:     Martijn Coenen <maco@...roid.com>
Cc:     Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@...nel.org>,
        Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
        Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, miklos@...redi.hu, tj@...nel.org,
        linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        kernel-team@...roid.com
Subject: Re: Writeback bug causing writeback stalls

On Sat 23-05-20 10:15:20, Martijn Coenen wrote:
> Jaegeuk wondered whether callers of write_inode_now() should hold
> i_rwsem, and whether that would also prevent this problem. Some
> existing callers of write_inode_now() do, eg ntfs and hfs:
> 
> hfs_file_fsync()
>     inode_lock(inode);
> 
>     /* sync the inode to buffers */
>     ret = write_inode_now(inode, 0);
> 
> but there are also some that don't (eg fat, fuse, orangefs).

Well, most importantly filesystems like ext4, xfs, btrfs don't hold i_rwsem
when writing back inode and that's deliberate because of performance. We
don't want to block writes (or event reads in case of XFS) for the inode
during writeback.

								Honza
-- 
Jan Kara <jack@...e.com>
SUSE Labs, CR

Powered by blists - more mailing lists