[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACRpkdbSsVcy=6Bo42SnPqgKoa+jNanmBEXix_yv6aNK8VcreQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 25 May 2020 11:02:14 +0200
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>
Cc: Mayank Grover <groverm@...eaurora.org>,
Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
"open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
MSM <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Neeraj Upadhyay <neeraju@...eaurora.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: msm: Add check for pinctrl group is valid
On Tue, May 19, 2020 at 3:39 AM Bjorn Andersson
<bjorn.andersson@...aro.org> wrote:
> @Linus, we started off with something similar for GPIOs and ended up
> with the logic in the core code. Should we somehow try to do the same
> for pinctrl?
msm_pingroup_is_valid() looks very reusable but I'm afraid I do not
understand the implicit assumptions around it, but I guess yes,
if it can be properly documented etc.
Yours,
Linus Walleij
Powered by blists - more mailing lists