linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: Tree for May 21 (objtool warnings)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <alpine.LSU.2.21.2005251303430.24984@pobox.suse.cz>
Date:   Mon, 25 May 2020 13:07:27 +0200 (CEST)
From:   Miroslav Benes <mbenes@...e.cz>
To:     Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
cc:     Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
        Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for May 21 (objtool warnings)

> I'll try to find out which optimization does this, because it is a 
> slightly different scenario than hiding __noreturn from the callees. 
> Probably -fno-ipa-pure-const again.

And it is indeed -fno-ipa-pure-const again.

Miroslav