[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200525111114.GB17206@bombadil.infradead.org>
Date: Mon, 25 May 2020 04:11:14 -0700
From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Cc: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/7] radix-tree: Use local_lock for protection
On Mon, May 25, 2020 at 08:29:54AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > +void radix_tree_preload_end(void)
> > +{
> > + local_unlock(&radix_tree_preloads.lock);
> > +}
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL(radix_tree_preload_end);
>
> Since upstream we are still mapping the local_lock primitives to
> preempt_disable()/preempt_enable(), I believe these uninlining changes should not be done
> in this patch, i.e. idr_preload_end() and radix_tree_preload_end() should stay inline.
But radix_tree_preloads is static, and I wouldn't be terribly happy to
see that exported to modules.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists