linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] ASoC: fsl_asrc: Fix -Wmissing-prototypes warning

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 25 May 2020 15:57:14 +0100
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:     Xiubo.Lee@...il.com, Shengjiu Wang <shengjiu.wang@....com>,
        lgirdwood@...il.com, festevam@...il.com, timur@...nel.org,
        perex@...ex.cz, alsa-devel@...a-project.org,
        nicoleotsuka@...il.com, tiwai@...e.com
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ASoC: fsl_asrc: Fix -Wmissing-prototypes warning

On Mon, 25 May 2020 17:03:32 +0800, Shengjiu Wang wrote:
> COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=clang make.cross ARCH=x86_64
> 
> sound/soc/fsl/fsl_asrc.c:557:18: warning: no previous prototype for function 'fsl_asrc_get_dma_channel' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
> struct dma_chan *fsl_asrc_get_dma_channel(struct fsl_asrc_pair *pair, bool dir)
>                  ^
> sound/soc/fsl/fsl_asrc.c:557:1: note: declare 'static' if the function is not intended to be used outside of this translation unit
> struct dma_chan *fsl_asrc_get_dma_channel(struct fsl_asrc_pair *pair, bool dir)
> ^
> static

Applied to

   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/sound.git for-next

Thanks!

[1/1] ASoC: fsl_asrc: Fix -Wmissing-prototypes warning
      commit: cff1f8b4f8e119a9dbd9872d7a04fedef8d0c1a2

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark