[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4be64892-e027-a58d-09f5-0450088292f6@forissier.org>
Date: Mon, 25 May 2020 17:53:39 +0200
From: Jerome Forissier <jerome@...issier.org>
To: Maxim Uvarov <maxim.uvarov@...aro.org>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"tee-dev @ lists . linaro . org" <tee-dev@...ts.linaro.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...aro.org>,
linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org, peterhuewe@....de
Subject: Re: [Tee-dev] [PATCHv3 2/3] optee: use uuid for sysfs driver entry
On 5/25/20 3:36 PM, Maxim Uvarov wrote:
> On Mon, 25 May 2020 at 15:10, Jerome Forissier <jerome@...issier.org> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On 5/25/20 1:52 PM, Maxim Uvarov wrote:
>>> Optee device names for sysfs needed to be unique
>>
>> s/Optee/OP-TEE/
>> s/needed/need/
>>
>>> and it's better if they will mean something. UUID for name
>>> looks like good solution:
>>> /sys/bus/tee/devices/optee-clnt-<uuid>
>>
>> How about mentioning it is the UUID of the Trusted Application on the
>> TEE side?
>>
>
> Jerome, do you think optee-ta-<uuid> is more suitable here?
Yes, a bit better I think. More "self explanatory"... kind of :)
Is it possible to have several devices bound to the same TA? I think
nothing forbids this although we may not have any use case for now...
--
Jerome
Powered by blists - more mailing lists