linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: Tree for May 25 (fs/io

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <f80e6229-ad84-3a0a-1566-772b4fa0c3ee@kernel.dk>
Date:   Mon, 25 May 2020 13:18:00 -0600
From:   Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
To:     Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
        Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
        Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>
Cc:     Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        io-uring@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for May 25 (fs/io_uring)

On 5/25/20 1:08 PM, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> On 5/25/20 12:02 PM, Jens Axboe wrote:
>> On 5/25/20 10:35 AM, Randy Dunlap wrote:
>>> On 5/25/20 5:49 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>>>> Hi all,
>>>>
>>>> Changes since 20200522:
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> on i386:
>>>
>>> ../fs/io_uring.c:500:26: error: field ‘wpq’ has incomplete type
>>>   struct wait_page_queue  wpq;
>>
>> Missing pagemap.h include, didn't bite me on x86-64. I'll fold in
>> a fix, thanks!
>>
> 
> I see it on x86_64. It must depend on some kernel config setting.

Most certainly. Updated branch has the include, and I updated my
for-next as well.

-- 
Jens Axboe