lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 26 May 2020 08:51:33 +0200
From:   Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Andra Paraschiv <andraprs@...zon.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Anthony Liguori <aliguori@...zon.com>,
        Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
        Colm MacCarthaigh <colmmacc@...zon.com>,
        Bjoern Doebel <doebel@...zon.de>,
        David Woodhouse <dwmw@...zon.co.uk>,
        Frank van der Linden <fllinden@...zon.com>,
        Alexander Graf <graf@...zon.de>,
        Martin Pohlack <mpohlack@...zon.de>,
        Matt Wilson <msw@...zon.com>,
        Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
        Balbir Singh <sblbir@...zon.com>,
        Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@...hat.com>,
        Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@...hat.com>,
        Stewart Smith <trawets@...zon.com>,
        Uwe Dannowski <uwed@...zon.de>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
        ne-devel-upstream@...zon.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 07/18] nitro_enclaves: Init misc device providing the
 ioctl interface

On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 01:13:23AM +0300, Andra Paraschiv wrote:
> +#define NE "nitro_enclaves: "

Again, no need for this.

> +#define NE_DEV_NAME "nitro_enclaves"

KBUILD_MODNAME?

> +#define NE_IMAGE_LOAD_OFFSET (8 * 1024UL * 1024UL)
> +
> +static char *ne_cpus;
> +module_param(ne_cpus, charp, 0644);
> +MODULE_PARM_DESC(ne_cpus, "<cpu-list> - CPU pool used for Nitro Enclaves");

Again, please do not do this.

Can you get the other amazon.com developers on the cc: list to review
this before you send it out again?  I feel like I am doing basic review
of things that should be easily caught by them before you ask the
community to review your code.

And get them to sign off on it too, showing they agree with the design
decisions here :)

thanks,

greg k-h

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ