[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200526225120.GH33628@sasha-vm>
Date: Tue, 26 May 2020 18:51:20 -0400
From: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
To: Don Porter <porter@...unc.edu>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
bp@...en8.de, luto@...nel.org, hpa@...or.com,
dave.hansen@...el.com, tony.luck@...el.com,
ravi.v.shankar@...el.com, chang.seok.bae@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v12 00/18] Enable FSGSBASE instructions
On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 06:03:35PM -0400, Don Porter wrote:
>On 5/26/20 4:27 PM, Sasha Levin wrote:
>>I'm really worried about the disconnect between how you view the current
>>state of Graphene (and the industry) vs Intel and the various cloud
>>providers.
>>
>>You keep suggesting that its just past the academic research state,
>>while Intel and the big cloud providers are already pushing it to
>>external customers. Every one of those cloud providers has a preview/GA
>>secure enclave offering.
>>
>
>I wonder if you are conflating Graphene with SGX? I understand that
>many cloud vendors are offering SGX in preview/GA, but there are other
>frameworks to build these offerings on, such as Intel's SGX SDK or
>Haven. It would be news to me if every major cloud vendor were
>putting Graphene in production.
Sorry, I wasn't trying to suggest that all cloud vendors are pushing
Graphene, but rather than SGX enabled platforms became a commodity
product, users will end up using Graphene-like applications.
Let me provide an example:
https://www.alibabacloud.com/blog/protecting-go-language-applications-with-the-graphene-library-os-on-intel%C2%AE-sgx%C2%AE-secured-alibaba-cloud_594889
- a "practical" guide on how to run Graphene in production environment
on one of the big cloud vendor platforms.
--
Thanks,
Sasha
Powered by blists - more mailing lists