linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 01/10] clk: qcom: clk-alpha-pll: remove unused/incorrect PLL_CAL

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <86a7c49f-44ea-11d3-2983-8443ad7ec309@marek.ca>
Date:   Tue, 26 May 2020 19:30:38 -0400
From:   Jonathan Marek <jonathan@...ek.ca>
To:     Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
        Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
        linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/10] clk: qcom: clk-alpha-pll: remove unused/incorrect
 PLL_CAL_VAL

On 5/26/20 7:21 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> Quoting Jonathan Marek (2020-05-24 14:06:02)
>> 0x44 isn't a register offset, it is the value that goes into CAL_L_VAL.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Marek <jonathan@...ek.ca>
>> ---
> 
> Any fixes tag?
> 

This doesn't fix anything (its unused as the commit message says), does 
that still qualify for a fixes tag?