lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200526082303.GB35238@gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 26 May 2020 10:23:03 +0200
From:   Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To:     Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc:     LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
        Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@...rix.com>,
        X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>,
        "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>,
        Alexandre Chartre <alexandre.chartre@...cle.com>,
        Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>,
        Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
        Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@...el.com>,
        Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
        Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
        Joel Fernandes <joel@...lfernandes.org>,
        Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>,
        Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>,
        Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>,
        Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>,
        Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>,
        Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
        Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>,
        Wei Liu <wei.liu@...nel.org>,
        Michael Kelley <mikelley@...rosoft.com>,
        Jason Chen CJ <jason.cj.chen@...el.com>,
        Zhao Yakui <yakui.zhao@...el.com>,
        "Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [patch V9 04/39] x86/entry: Provide
 idtentry_entry/exit_cond_rcu()


* Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de> wrote:

> From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
> 
> After a lengthy discussion [1] it turned out that RCU does not need a full
> rcu_irq_enter/exit() when RCU is already watching. All it needs if
> NOHZ_FULL is active is to check whether the tick needs to be restarted.
> 
> This allows to avoid a separate variant for the pagefault handler which
> cannot invoke rcu_irq_enter() on a kernel pagefault which might sleep.
> 
> The cond_rcu argument is only temporary and will be removed once the
> existing users of idtentry_enter/exit() have been cleaned up. After that
> the code can be significantly simplified.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
> Link: [1] https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200515235125.628629605@linutronix.de
> ---
> V9: Reworked to the new RCU mode
> ---
>  arch/x86/entry/common.c         |   84 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
>  arch/x86/include/asm/idtentry.h |   14 +++++-
>  2 files changed, 77 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
> 
> --- a/arch/x86/entry/common.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/entry/common.c
> @@ -512,8 +512,10 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE0(ni_syscall)
>  }
>  
>  /**
> - * idtentry_enter - Handle state tracking on idtentry
> + * idtentry_enter_cond_rcu - Handle state tracking on idtentry with conditional
> + *			     RCU handling
>   * @regs:	Pointer to pt_regs of interrupted context
> + * @cond_rcu:	Invoke rcu_irq_enter() only if RCU is not watching
>   *
>   * Invokes:
>   *  - lockdep irqflag state tracking as low level ASM entry disabled
> @@ -521,40 +523,81 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE0(ni_syscall)
>   *
>   *  - Context tracking if the exception hit user mode.
>   *
> - *  - RCU notification if the exception hit kernel mode.
> - *
>   *  - The hardirq tracer to keep the state consistent as low level ASM
>   *    entry disabled interrupts.
> + *
> + * For kernel mode entries RCU handling is done conditional. If RCU is
> + * watching then the only RCU requirement is to check whether the tick has
> + * to be restarted. If RCU is not watching then rcu_irq_enter() has to be
> + * invoked on entry and rcu_irq_exit() on exit.
> + *
> + * Avoiding the rcu_irq_enter/exit() calls is an optimization but also
> + * solves the problem of kernel mode pagefaults which can schedule, which
> + * is not possible after invoking rcu_irq_enter() without undoing it.
> + *
> + * For user mode entries enter_from_user_mode() must be invoked to
> + * establish the proper context for NOHZ_FULL. Otherwise scheduling on exit
> + * would not be possible.
> + *
> + * Returns: True if RCU has been adjusted on a kernel entry
> + *	    False otherwise
> + *
> + * The return value must be fed into the rcu_exit argument of
> + * idtentry_exit_cond_rcu().
>   */
> -void noinstr idtentry_enter(struct pt_regs *regs)
> +bool noinstr idtentry_enter_cond_rcu(struct pt_regs *regs, bool cond_rcu)
>  {
>  	if (user_mode(regs)) {
>  		enter_from_user_mode();
>  	} else {
> -		lockdep_hardirqs_off(CALLER_ADDR0);
> -		rcu_irq_enter();
> -		instrumentation_begin();
> -		trace_hardirqs_off_prepare();
> -		instrumentation_end();
> +		if (!cond_rcu || !__rcu_is_watching()) {
> +			/*
> +			 * If RCU is not watching then the same careful
> +			 * sequence vs. lockdep and tracing is required
> +			 * as in enter_from_user_mode().
> +			 *
> +			 * This only happens for IRQs that hits the idle
> +			 * loop, i.e. if idle is not using MWAIT.
> +			 */
> +			lockdep_hardirqs_off(CALLER_ADDR0);
> +			rcu_irq_enter();
> +			instrumentation_begin();
> +			trace_hardirqs_off_prepare();
> +			instrumentation_end();
> +			return true;
> +		} else {
> +			/*
> +			 * If RCU is watching then RCU only wants to check
> +			 * whether it needs to restart the tick in NOHZ
> +			 * mode.
> +			 */
> +			instrumentation_begin();
> +			rcu_irq_enter_check_tick();
> +			/* Use the combo lockdep/tracing function */
> +			trace_hardirqs_off();
> +			instrumentation_end();
> +		}
>  	}
> +	return false;
>  }

Any objections to the simplified/flattened control flow below?

Thanks,

	Ingo

 common.c |   59 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------------
 1 file changed, 31 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
Index: tip/arch/x86/entry/common.c
===================================================================
--- tip.orig/arch/x86/entry/common.c
+++ tip/arch/x86/entry/common.c
@@ -549,35 +549,38 @@ bool noinstr idtentry_enter_cond_rcu(str
 {
 	if (user_mode(regs)) {
 		enter_from_user_mode();
-	} else {
-		if (!cond_rcu || !__rcu_is_watching()) {
-			/*
-			 * If RCU is not watching then the same careful
-			 * sequence vs. lockdep and tracing is required
-			 * as in enter_from_user_mode().
-			 *
-			 * This only happens for IRQs that hit the idle
-			 * loop, i.e. if idle is not using MWAIT.
-			 */
-			lockdep_hardirqs_off(CALLER_ADDR0);
-			rcu_irq_enter();
-			instrumentation_begin();
-			trace_hardirqs_off_prepare();
-			instrumentation_end();
-			return true;
-		} else {
-			/*
-			 * If RCU is watching then RCU only wants to check
-			 * whether it needs to restart the tick in NOHZ
-			 * mode.
-			 */
-			instrumentation_begin();
-			rcu_irq_enter_check_tick();
-			/* Use the combo lockdep/tracing function */
-			trace_hardirqs_off();
-			instrumentation_end();
-		}
+		return false;
 	}
+
+	if (!cond_rcu || !__rcu_is_watching()) {
+		/*
+		 * If RCU is not watching then the same careful
+		 * sequence vs. lockdep and tracing is required
+		 * as in enter_from_user_mode().
+		 *
+		 * This only happens for IRQs that hit the idle
+		 * loop, i.e. if idle is not using MWAIT.
+		 */
+		lockdep_hardirqs_off(CALLER_ADDR0);
+		rcu_irq_enter();
+		instrumentation_begin();
+		trace_hardirqs_off_prepare();
+		instrumentation_end();
+
+		return true;
+	}
+
+	/*
+	 * If RCU is watching then RCU only wants to check
+	 * whether it needs to restart the tick in NOHZ
+	 * mode.
+	 */
+	instrumentation_begin();
+	rcu_irq_enter_check_tick();
+	/* Use the combo lockdep/tracing function */
+	trace_hardirqs_off();
+	instrumentation_end();
+
 	return false;
 }
 

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ